Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2360DC433F5 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 15:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237641AbhKTPYR (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 10:24:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50590 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230038AbhKTPYQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 10:24:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17403C061574; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 07:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d5so23685809wrc.1; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 07:21:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CyM3+eJ6aCtIacq87VUybJ0cUWuQiHmdVvSz9Qi8v8s=; b=CNQAcXJ4z8SdArb9OgLusWsevmQHhW+tuboXBc6JnNgu86F027TOwmxWz6183a9F5v Lbg8p4yRRnwPTgTcQ1dZZqC9CoTuPdPOZf5gVkHbTYyoDHT+gs42lVg0XPsb6QoqgzkF vwTEILg/ALALrvd2GSfdATnqFJQ+d9vIXSi9e2MxRIwjD4zbBkU4yS266sjjmBZH2ZvN CpodapjdlkXXZTog9TUJMWm9aJHX1NTuMf1wNyLXONPaD9YQEWsX763pFdGyz0jVFMW/ zwlqhf7ba3qwNTbpEni/G94wx/NcW/Kh/MKEFPyxC7eupl04BxlFtIdnrVqf0ba27yoR bZrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CyM3+eJ6aCtIacq87VUybJ0cUWuQiHmdVvSz9Qi8v8s=; b=JDxeXWekmrnmTPmMnHna39cXOLMZ6mMunOZTjo/5ldnHPI+H6dQB34gYIoIU6myv9V JPcs1av0gGB8u+IUbYQ0ph5pxyPvSFOlM5P02IyK/sGp6IjUxqxu+QKdJDCmLmZlDZSg egoA7aRBQ1tvFVvZJsGCJiYLcjk9VC1KAOKE8fezhQXMNsE+fkICRt/BprFfi+2hRXmM yZQ+cmh5knwJBgOKBD+8H1gMiIWCuSbMDlPixpYxQfU4ulLRdsrqHMyWefRtBPbMW2Z1 5iKyhnQTYxACCy/axl521sH4dwWru+hHVLKqIH87iAPNkw/QONyqdVzKQmJ/cSSC68SH WMwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ojb8Y75jHPyyCgMZJSpsyoOgJh9Y8bSiIYv5Dq3JhrgvpzW5t z8LI0d76uB1HWp15qf5uV78= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys0Fs9mVGxnNnEGUHfR0eQm6JUHSXf3yvQ45uNMJHUZ/bPMj7ze7/j5yj7jTnetGgWC5povw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:52:: with SMTP id k18mr18199747wrx.192.1637421671581; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 07:21:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f81sm17254100wmf.22.2021.11.20.07.21.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 07:21:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 15:21:09 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/21] 5.10.81-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211119171443.892729043@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211119171443.892729043@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/410 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/409 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip