Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A7CC433F5 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237758AbhKTQKN (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:10:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60724 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234225AbhKTQKM (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:10:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EBFEC061574 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id r25so19157916edq.7 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:07:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dONUrPBQwEgXgwz1i2/FBCEms8zfe8jywFdMB4mBXn4=; b=p02MlVcnpAL59IC1CFThAJanmgBNwLNMFmClxr4XxyrmJIAJCiG4QEvcaeMhVux5KK PltstlpjhjeZGhySZdst1n/xCeLtTb28nS9CMQrtpnqJheuZ6+oGUpiQWukqMQFFcbhv 3/HxF+qbxFBCV3uuM5FDNJyVBLvXDltHS4FbFc2+6RSEh0WUzjD82P0wKyRa9vHtxNBF 6EoMZae0QC/fKJ0mSoOftz0BqAJLRWkoPH/y9Bl9l4IlqV18V0sPUHYFaKeJktaB6my5 IDkrR4DWznO23uPFGvkBUeQqH3v9ncao3D4CmDRlZzpZo344/LhxQvfICeMdMI78LJ++ ZCGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dONUrPBQwEgXgwz1i2/FBCEms8zfe8jywFdMB4mBXn4=; b=cSWxRDLr10M/nGt9RnofgxjyI/JHz/vdYk0TimQoW2pYzMmsCI0HRepAvEs9RiEcnr yvElaN3Orzju6Cr4tOzCYgujgsGClLrmIub5JN+rUR/4pxoUojWTxLkywvfTpfKiHE3m /TnOdczmzSsuVcf/udOX4bxnNg1Owf5PnSs1qu4RhJvoQML4A3LEN3Ua6Wxpye8/YpO5 X+Tvt0uNEoEoWJ8r8PKO9mEgidtX/AZrelVXlD76xB15DK8YdnkDebUN8FaW6KRnLgt3 caOsOQQOljduYdzS/KsYMz4FZZCFX5FxJmGub6+kJTLNHJN9dsfMtmM4haj1/ATXCJKq OPHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ysPT2Pi8tvVWupqRCCE4NErNnSLxIGl1siu7lV05JoUYt6+WN lQhxan031IR2luVPIjiJMsD87TjENSak+aM5NCxbiA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzu/dUAVr4ckZlvVgHmm7HoIdGr2Te9Xczlhu0xFEnuPIRlpGJ06pYxucIhNrkkwpJA6w87b+1dKb1sa4bYJHM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4311:: with SMTP id m17mr20517745edc.103.1637424426738; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:07:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211119171443.892729043@linuxfoundation.org> <106740f9-4efc-f1ac-fd42-bf8afc994333@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <106740f9-4efc-f1ac-fd42-bf8afc994333@linaro.org> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:36:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/21] 5.10.81-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, pavel@denx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, =?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIETDrWF6?= , Ondrej Zary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Peter Zijlstra + Thomas Gleixner + Borislav Petkov + Ondrej Zary On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 20:57, Daniel D=C3=ADaz wro= te: > > Hello! > > On 11/19/21 11:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. > > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-= 5.10.81-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable= -rc.git linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > ------------- > > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: > > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Linux 5.10.81-rc1 > [...]> Peter Zijlstra > > x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage This is due to ^ new kernel code + old test case (Test case needs to be updated) > [...] > > Results from Linaro's test farm. > Regressions found on x86_64 and i386, on iopl. Here's an excerpt of the s= elftest: > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.10.81-rc1 (oe-user@oe-host) (x86_64-lin= aro-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.30.0.20180208) #1 SMP Fr= i Nov 19 19:48:55 UTC 2021 > [...] > [ 170.351838] traps: iopl_64[2769] attempts to use CLI/STI, pretendin= g it's a NOP, ip:400dde in iopl_64[400000+2000] > [...] > # selftests: x86: iopl_64 > # [FAIL] CLI worked > # [FAIL] STI worked This failure was detected on linux next and the later test case has been fi= xed. The Following patch could fix this problem across 5.10, 5.14 and 5.15. Patch details, --- selftests/x86/iopl: Adjust to the faked iopl CLI/STI usage Commit in Fixes changed the iopl emulation to not #GP on CLI and STI because it would break some insane luserspace tools which would toggle interrupts. The corresponding selftest would rely on the fact that executing CLI/STI would trigger a #GP and thus detect it this way but since that #GP is not happening anymore, the detection is now wrong too. Extend the test to actually look at the IF flag and whether executing those insns had any effect on it. The STI detection needs to have the fact that interrupts were previously disabled, passed in so do that from the previous CLI test, i.e., STI test needs to follow a previous CLI one for it to make sense. Fixes: b968e84b509d ("x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211030083939.13073-1-bp@alien8.de > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0xed failed > # child: set IOPL to 3 > # [RUN] child: write to 0x80 > # [FAIL] CLI worked > # [FAIL] STI worked > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0xed failed > # [OK] Child succeeded > # [RUN] parent: write to 0x80 (should fail) > # [OK] outb to 0x80 failed > # [OK] CLI faulted > # [OK] STI faulted > # iopl(3) > # Drop privileges > # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL=3D=3D3 > # [RUN] iopl(0) unprivileged > # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged > # [OK] Failed as expected > not ok 7 selftests: x86: iopl_64 # exit=3D1 > > The baseline kernel (v5.10.80) exhibited this output: > # selftests: x86: iopl_64 > # [OK] CLI faulted > # [OK] STI faulted > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0xed failed > # child: set IOPL to 3 > # [RUN] child: write to 0x80 > # [OK] CLI faulted > # [OK] STI faulted > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked > # [OK] outb to 0xed failed > # [OK] Child succeeded > # [RUN] parent: write to 0x80 (should fail) > # [OK] outb to 0x80 failed > # [OK] CLI faulted > # [OK] STI faulted > # iopl(3) > # Drop privileges > # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL=3D=3D3 > # [RUN] iopl(0) unprivileged > # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged > # [OK] Failed as expected > ok 7 selftests: x86: iopl_64 > > > ## Build > * kernel: 5.10.81-rc1 > * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-sta= ble-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc= '] > * git branch: linux-5.10.y > * git commit: ed689bd1df46a07911fffa509cd06c5ec7beb9c1 > * git describe: v5.10.80-22-ged689bd1df46 > * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-= 5.10.y/build/v5.10.80-22-ged689bd1df46 > > ## Regressions (compared to v5.10.80) > * i386, kselftest-x86 > - x86.iopl_32 > > * qemu_x86_64, kselftest-x86 > - x86.iopl_64 > > * x86, kselftest-x86 > - x86.iopl_64 > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.80) > > ## Test result summary > total: 91125, pass: 77560, fail: 574, skip: 12243, xfail: 748 > > ## Build Summary > * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed > * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed > * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed > * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed > * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed > * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed > * powerpc: 54 total, 46 passed, 8 failed > * riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed > * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed > * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed > * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed > * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed > * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed > > ## Test suites summary > * fwts > * igt-gpu-tools > * kselftest-android > * kselftest-bpf > * kselftest-breakpoints > * kselftest-capabilities > * kselftest-cgroup > * kselftest-clone3 > * kselftest-core > * kselftest-cpu-hotplug > * kselftest-cpufreq > * kselftest-drivers > * kselftest-efivarfs > * kselftest-filesystems > * kselftest-firmware > * kselftest-fpu > * kselftest-futex > * kselftest-gpio > * kselftest-intel_pstate > * kselftest-ipc > * kselftest-ir > * kselftest-kcmp > * kselftest-kexec > * kselftest-kvm > * kselftest-lib > * kselftest-livepatch > * kselftest-membarrier > * kselftest-memfd > * kselftest-memory-hotplug > * kselftest-mincore > * kselftest-mount > * kselftest-mqueue > * kselftest-net > * kselftest-netfilter > * kselftest-nsfs > * kselftest-openat2 > * kselftest-pid_namespace > * kselftest-pidfd > * kselftest-proc > * kselftest-pstore > * kselftest-ptrace > * kselftest-rseq > * kselftest-rtc > * kselftest-seccomp > * kselftest-sigaltstack > * kselftest-size > * kselftest-splice > * kselftest-static_keys > * kselftest-sync > * kselftest-sysctl > * kselftest-tc-testing > * kselftest-timens > * kselftest-timers > * kselftest-tmpfs > * kselftest-tpm2 > * kselftest-user > * kselftest-vm > * kselftest-x86 > * kselftest-zram > * kunit > * kvm-unit-tests > * libgpiod > * libhugetlbfs > * linux-log-parser > * ltp-cap_bounds-tests > * ltp-commands-tests > * ltp-containers-tests > * ltp-controllers-tests > * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests > * ltp-crypto-tests > * ltp-cve-tests > * ltp-dio-tests > * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests > * ltp-filecaps-tests > * ltp-fs-tests > * ltp-fs_bind-tests > * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests > * ltp-fsx-tests > * ltp-hugetlb-tests > * ltp-io-tests > * ltp-ipc-tests > * ltp-math-tests > * ltp-mm-tests > * ltp-nptl-tests > * ltp-open-posix-tests > * ltp-pty-tests > * ltp-sched-tests > * ltp-securebits-tests > * ltp-syscalls-tests > * ltp-tracing-tests > * network-basic-tests > * packetdrill > * perf > * rcutorture > * ssuite > * v4l2-compliance > > > Greetings! > > Daniel D=C3=ADaz > daniel.diaz@linaro.org > > -- > Linaro LKFT > https://lkft.linaro.org