Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23E2C433EF for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238291AbhKUOUa (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2021 09:20:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36338 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234993AbhKUOU3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2021 09:20:29 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6223EC061574; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 06:17:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id g14so64937683edb.8; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 06:17:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ShHRmCcVEJj0a/nM7y9KPmoK+HrmonPdTpFQaYkAuHI=; b=AO9D4Sh+oAdGVEZIirqgA0SnjwAsXeqsTtm6X0ZIj/A1xvGAkqVAUZ7/NuBnsFzrr6 1ChH3NHfNMV9gflhu/RkKG0GQ3IvdZGfxPoiemA2Xqj7H/xvmBILl2nbtyrezj1cW11/ aQlY/QwL+G/Dt6ZcpVFtL5m+HSeeCi1k7sK1hJOEuqaYtPoX9ikYSavV1AQpKE8ZHRAT 8I9Tz2hU+XrTnSV2gnM7+H3Dwo72h3PxLOrCRNbO8H4Fza5/JYLZomRwLavk53r6sYtm oD6w8LfTsCdewa6/s2kZ8u91vkvCwcqnjZ4wfLARX5IF2+WcSQ3ESqCtE/dnUyNP1XET vPtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ShHRmCcVEJj0a/nM7y9KPmoK+HrmonPdTpFQaYkAuHI=; b=rLyBH8PPm+sHUIrjIaDP3HcwORV+KAZVEPwu/puvyfAK8YWEvC4aPvu6RziKcxUc3f FzmWCHgiqFK9kCIu/NU6/27hqbNv+mePGbKrjEy7Nu5egbvOCwVNxrwWB1gh+oPpgY8e RTSko5PLs1NuFgyNp8kJKjDNtgD9XQTCehFIWlVFiWS4GCwZb4/HiVG4NBNucqH5ca1L 4gZUxvbnPze3GWRBDqSyyhvuSRRfkb3GEQ3NzguyhKnSuUMe7GXEKb6lLpCYZYmfGsxU 3hmegr6n/VDbduYr7m2JlrJpNNE8OE8JN7dAetmu6E49DGUrxZCyOvNRR35VTY27krZp s/SA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bPwlY3I6FAvJCKevKuSqVx7D8gg3quh7vfz/J0TjzhIlp5NvD frR2pFDlzGgczvwv99btbQz/HGxz7tS/GtAWKsk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuDJKc4E27+YhUM6jyOtARE7XCkMgCzB55cTNlmZJgOi5aBJFLYdzOVKMPTRQX4C7CWQBoV1Ul18t7CPcL1fI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:160b:: with SMTP id hb11mr31645885ejc.336.1637504242305; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 06:17:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211104161804.587250-1-aford173@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Adam Ford Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:17:11 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Tim Harvey , Linux ARM Mailing List , Adam Ford-BE , "Ariel D'Alessandro" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lucas Stach , Device Tree Mailing List , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , NXP Linux Team , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 8:12 AM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:07 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > I cannot replicate your issue. I applied the patch series to > > 5.16-rc1, and it's still working for me. > > Could the different behavior be caused by different TF-A versions that > you and Tim used? > > Which ATF version do you use? Is it TF-A v2.5? I am using https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-atf/log/?h=lf_v2.4 Since the driver sending SMCC commands to ATF isn't doing that, I assume it's safe to use the linux power-domain drivers with the ATF from NXP's kernel. If you can point me to the repo you think I should be using, I'll give it a try. thanks, adam > > Thanks