From:   Li Hua <hucool.lihua@huawei.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
CC:     <yuehaibing@huawei.com>, <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <w.f@huawei.com>,
        <hucool.lihua@huawei.com>, <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>,
        <judy.chenhui@huawei.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/rt: Try to restart rt period timer when rt runtime exceeded
Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:03:53 +0000
Message-ID: <20211122040353.7850-1-hucool.lihua@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

When rt_runtime is modified from -1 to a valid control value, it may
cause the task to be throttled all the time. Operations like the following
will trigger the bug. E.g:
1. echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
2. Run a FIFO task named A that executes while(1)
3. echo 950000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us

When rt_runtime is -1, The rt period timer will not be activated when task A
enqueued. And then the task will be throttled after setting rt_runtime to
950,000. The task will always be throttled because the rt period timer is not
activated.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Hua <hucool.lihua@huawei.com>

v1->v2:
  - call do_start_rt_bandwidth to reduce repetitive code.
  - use raw_spin_lock_irqsave to avoid deadlock on a timer context.
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index b48baaba2fc2..7b4f4fbbb404 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -52,11 +52,8 @@ void init_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, u64 period, u64 runtime)
 	rt_b->rt_period_timer.function = sched_rt_period_timer;
 }
 
-static void start_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b)
+static inline void do_start_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b)
 {
-	if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled() || rt_b->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
-		return;
-
 	raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
 	if (!rt_b->rt_period_active) {
 		rt_b->rt_period_active = 1;
@@ -75,6 +72,14 @@ static void start_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b)
 	raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
 }
 
+static void start_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b)
+{
+	if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled() || rt_b->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
+		return;
+
+	do_start_rt_bandwidth(rt_b);
+}
+
 void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 {
 	struct rt_prio_array *array;
@@ -1031,13 +1036,17 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq)
 
 	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
 		struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
+		int exceeded;
 
 		if (sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq) != RUNTIME_INF) {
 			raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
 			rt_rq->rt_time += delta_exec;
-			if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq))
+			exceeded = sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq);
+			if (exceeded)
 				resched_curr(rq);
 			raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
+			if (exceeded)
+				do_start_rt_bandwidth(sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq));
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -2911,8 +2920,12 @@ static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
 
 static void sched_rt_do_global(void)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&def_rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime_lock, flags);
 	def_rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime = global_rt_runtime();
 	def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period = ns_to_ktime(global_rt_period());
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&def_rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime_lock, flags);
 }
 
 int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
-- 
2.17.1