Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5B9C433EF for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 06:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232467AbhKVGY4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 01:24:56 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59672 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229527AbhKVGYz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 01:24:55 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AD5560E08; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 06:21:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1637562109; bh=fzsRN4izc+0jRBS7aC+AnWDJdXqUSKg6OSnIdhhFAxc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=F1neIeXxphTLVqAMO4AQgvcHh8s03h+MeFaPz/RpjL2BobhAbGpta6xGAkP7grzRl MEmsMHSHhsCd0I4/E6EYJvVYv4QZIdLaV1mtJlafgIz/xhloLSeBq1PWbyLTgOt2Er LdfnBC3V6VXeePIONb7cClfQkrFCIAyws4oWKNiA= Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:21:38 +0100 From: Greg KH To: "David E. Box" Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com, mgross@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver Message-ID: References: <20211120231705.189969-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <20211120231705.189969-5-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <4d8ba355de09a4a806b6075305ca8d7156dc70ef.camel@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4d8ba355de09a4a806b6075305ca8d7156dc70ef.camel@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:18:25AM -0800, David E. Box wrote: > > These sysfs attributes are crazy. Who has audited them to be correct > > and work properly? It feels like there are just buffer overflows > > waiting to be exploited in them due to the reading/writing of raw memory > > buffers all over the place. > > Agree with the concern. I can submit the tests that were used. Is selftests the > best place? Yes. > > Where is the userspace tool that uses these files? > > The tool will be published in the same github repo as the spec once the driver > is ready. Isn't the driver "ready" if you are asking for it to be accepted here? Why isn't it published already so we can see if it actually is tested? thanks, greg k-h