Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161085AbXALV2K (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:28:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161006AbXALV2K (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:28:10 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:56390 "EHLO omx1.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161085AbXALV2I (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:28:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:28:01 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Paul Jackson cc: akpm@osdl.org, sander@humilis.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1) In-Reply-To: <20070112132016.f11ffc8a.pj@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20070111222627.66bb75ab.akpm@osdl.org> <20070112105224.GA12813@favonius> <20070112032820.9c995718.pj@sgi.com> <20070112132016.f11ffc8a.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 17 On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Paul Jackson wrote: > Argh - minor detail, but this is the first (outside of fs/proc/base.c) > "#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS" in a kernel *.c file. I prefer to avoid that. Sorry but there will be number of those once we get the dirty writeback for cpusets fixed. Did you review that patchset (only internally mailed so far). I do not think it makes much sense to do these macros for the single occurrence here and otherwise. Having the #ifdef here is much clearer. Also the #ifdef is in already NUMA specific code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/