Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EE6C433FE for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233692AbhKVSv7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:51:59 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33808 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237048AbhKVSvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:51:47 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E05960F70; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:48:37 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , workflows@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] Create 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Message-ID: <20211122134837.7489d725@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <3823dfb9-cc72-57ae-a296-92d506de1531@leemhuis.info> References: <20211122151233.54xtnpwdmnrdj3jf@meerkat.local> <20211122120405.7a1e1c9f@gandalf.local.home> <3823dfb9-cc72-57ae-a296-92d506de1531@leemhuis.info> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:40:46 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hmmm. I'm not opposed, but I wonder if 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' are > this tiny bit easier to handle (both for placing and analyzing scripts) > that makes the difference between "nice idea, but fails to be used in > the field" and "after some tradition phase this becomes the new normal" > in the end. Either way is fine for me. My scripts are trivial and easy to update. I'm more worried about what other people may use. -- Steve