Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F56C433F5 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240243AbhKVTzZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:55:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35548 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237508AbhKVTzU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:55:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF81C061714 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:52:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id gf14-20020a17090ac7ce00b001a7a2a0b5c3so130479pjb.5 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:52:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=R+2NVVaB7HNzmKzz9pvoSqA0OaPLrTBeTq2QxKS1nB4=; b=PItd8EYo8Or7WokynjwCq8i4x/kFYinllcqQW39lWPjhQH55Ihfl8074H3A0R5NWdM 7bwmIv/NVpbT96+rfUIhsSDFQN7pWgdmU/yqB6bJdf9srpYAnFGAbgwyB4Uo2eWh7pRm TVx0PLEsVbgfx2vBS0qrsgdS5jeIffJcFJ81iYVAenMiSPmS3GCDmMh6ZzoO4KFD+fPW rDqgCbYIk1lE+8oWppClXldsAPfdApQ/aXDXj8RCohAjMA3zkR8ttxqe9zXXeYnLtHSu 5aBB9sbfBkzu0EQMUkVTgiM8dPa3R3duOims5aLa9QsuCsrUXOUz2gjkGy5bDrNmI8HP yLeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=R+2NVVaB7HNzmKzz9pvoSqA0OaPLrTBeTq2QxKS1nB4=; b=diqhzzej+NA/KewMqVKROVvXwj6i59UivUbr5C1Iu9gyBoUXLn0WCOpXTEn/TNTEpF PrQgFbOOkzcbcohEmIZO+evhTmXbhvvpnbqQhJi9wsPJM1qCpOOdmk8zej/cYf/pta9s A12PnFo+/JvmpljGC16ouHlCI4NB27I1onAee0j7oAgnE5EWcE9mkR5CGI3pQ8qi3TQE qDho0Urtm5rVBW8sPevGdq2x0sVxh+g7+5+Fm2KXL+R/7f7t0JxeaLa+8eOALLVqPECK 3TJBJmSblNYMsInxb4D+s6PmluyLV/YLO0ZBaHO78MhU3vk7MTOmXSeJ2hTI48OGmKfW NYrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Bq/a4IJ9YD8B6FcjP1iOFXFe23918991iqYtPY9wvM0JDTvzi 26tEt7ZmZotVFdA9/Fjj58F0Ww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjhM1+Fco2+HarM0SN9NtmRjgRYFfu9c3PjJCXM++heqDPF9Z5D+ei4bDwKF7/qqW/WdoXwg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c7:b0:141:eb39:30b7 with SMTP id i7-20020a17090332c700b00141eb3930b7mr75323371plr.41.1637610732883; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm8484620pjf.33.2021.11.22.11.52.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:52:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:52:08 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Peter Gonda Cc: Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] selftests: sev_migrate_tests: add tests for KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM Message-ID: References: <20211117163809.1441845-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20211117163809.1441845-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 17, 2021, Peter Gonda wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 9:38 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > +static void test_sev_mirror(bool es) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_vm *src_vm, *dst_vm; > > + struct kvm_sev_launch_start start = { > > + .policy = es ? SEV_POLICY_ES : 0 > > + }; > > + int i; > > + > > + src_vm = sev_vm_create(es); > > + dst_vm = aux_vm_create(false); > > + > > + sev_mirror_create(dst_vm->fd, src_vm->fd); > > + > > + /* Check that we can complete creation of the mirror VM. */ > > + for (i = 0; i < NR_MIGRATE_TEST_VCPUS; ++i) > > + vm_vcpu_add(dst_vm, i); > > Style question. I realized I didn't do this myself but should there > always be blank line after these conditionals/loops without {}s? Tom > had me add them to work in ccp driver, unsure if that should be > maintained everywhere. Generally speaking, yes. There will inevitably be exceptions where it's ok to omit a blank line, e.g. kvm_ioapic_clear_all() is a decent example, as is kvm_update_dr0123(). But for something like this where the for-loop is a different "block" than the following code, a blank line is preferred.