Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:24:26 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Cc:     workflows@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] docs: add the new commit-msg tags
 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:'
Message-ID: <20211122152426.7c2b3ab4@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <aa158444-4319-a019-1031-095a69105447@leemhuis.info>
References: <cover.1637566224.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
        <6b760115ecdd3687d4b82680b284f55a04f3ad90.1637566224.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
        <20211122112916.498810bb@gandalf.local.home>
        <aa158444-4319-a019-1031-095a69105447@leemhuis.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:50:35 +0100
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> wrote:

> > That said, I would like a way to have versions show a link to the last
> > version that was reviewed.
> > 
> > v1: has no tags
> > 
> > v2: has a Reviewed: tag to v1.
> > 
> > v3: has a Reviewed: tag to v2
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > Then the final commit could have a "Link" or "Reviewed" tag to v3, even
> > though there may not be any reviews to v3, but v3 has the link to v2, and
> > v2 has the link to v1, etc.  
> 
> Is that really worth it? Isn't it sufficient if the commit links to the
> last public review posting, as that already should link to all earlier
> review postings. Sure, not everybody is doing this right now, but maybe
> just educating people to do so is better than creating something new.

Isn't "as that already should link to all earlier review postings" what I'm
suggesting above? I haven't seen many people do that yet.

-- Steve