Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973AEC433FE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238095AbhKWOeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:34:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237964AbhKWOeK (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:34:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F53C061574; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:31:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id e3so92950947edu.4; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:31:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=//l1LUXCh3L79CgRUnueVTDppas02c3huxdsDhLLifA=; b=T15xAre4jIFB3U4IVeTooq7H+YdPwnaWfB3BNzoyFz/keHLFQ5vkBDnTutv6tbatV+ L66H1fyD/O1kAhKootlAKhntL9Gw1QyJX0WOsQxy9s2dI2hRRfJcQUYdkaJs5U78xvKP jzu+hLkJTXoig0uIhtNXKAsFE7jN4A/HrbQJru5aEOxdpxKkWzyHNwym2LBv5Mfb2cOQ JtDaxwk8uJVdFR816kmjk1lrHxJ46S/BWe7m9YWLRfHCe+q0YqWjXxMAgD4iOZkKCrE+ s3OeQ6CL2/BqKr4lbamObk4i+gdw4qcyu0rHMaDcxS1MGO0viyWsobSSR6dBTtVrFIQ6 5oqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=//l1LUXCh3L79CgRUnueVTDppas02c3huxdsDhLLifA=; b=Y0ji8PUxprtOiXVXlZjjl0WlUUnU11ESW7yGCOBKBUGRP+EPxdDlF4wzTPl+IPC8cv xgZnSvf7BvgSHM7S9oFJlnx1n5iJaXPGzA83jaE1a2QWEwkaW0YKeUfM/nP7wZ/H4lIf aF9lEszczmdDhzyv9D2uFj6/f/Vjk3N/4eqRCId1upkPZYJAbGkDOyQOkDzmBsqRej0U tUxNh+HfxibY4736qg/fETEBvEM/LsyZ4FHb1yw43lx/sn9EAilZK+AtJxOlSDLWt2zb DFpLfQNfBp90KnmlOOg3txwti5hTcpqVTOZHBjPpivqcKzrHXuvQjCBYGw3EKLf/N6eG +OYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xgmqj/cR4mpJIZ6GXznc49JWDTDSvJBNFbEFDe2k51LYf1PL0 IbrutUKw6yLUXhqpx0Az5qfJzP7QAW9TJKYLQk4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzC/1N8se4FPNP9Y5+FSeWzRJdkD5hvVeDNCCJEzLv+I4Lel88R5WODTobQZTglCDcOaNS6Wg5RP1ONQ3xrsw0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:94c2:: with SMTP id dn2mr8088560ejc.325.1637677860221; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:31:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211104161804.587250-1-aford173@gmail.com> <82c5da8862abaa430ee52b57e15d29a67106d61f.camel@pengutronix.de> <129460de1d6b02ad16fdac16a1437c5b2cbb3975.camel@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <129460de1d6b02ad16fdac16a1437c5b2cbb3975.camel@pengutronix.de> From: Adam Ford Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:30:49 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions To: Lucas Stach Cc: Tim Harvey , Fabio Estevam , Linux ARM Mailing List , Adam Ford-BE , "Ariel D'Alessandro" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Device Tree Mailing List , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , NXP Linux Team , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:24 AM Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Dienstag, dem 23.11.2021 um 08:08 -0600 schrieb Adam Ford: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:52 PM Tim Harvey wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:20 AM Lucas Stach wrote: > > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 22.11.2021 um 09:59 -0800 schrieb Tim Harvey: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 7:25 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 8:34 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 8:21 AM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:17 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am using https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-atf/log/?h=lf_v2.4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the driver sending SMCC commands to ATF isn't doing that, I > > > > > > > > > assume it's safe to use the linux power-domain drivers with the ATF > > > > > > > > > from NXP's kernel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can point me to the repo you think I should be using, I'll give it a try. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you know if the mainline TF-A repo v2.5 works too? > > > > > > > > https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/tree/v2.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's good to know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just built it into U-Boot: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: BL31: v2.5(release):v2.5 > > > > > > > NOTICE: BL31: Built : 08:24:13, Nov 21 2021 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Etnaviv driver is still loading without hanging > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root@beacon-imx8mn-kit:~# dmesg |grep -i etna > > > > > > > [ 12.393936] etnaviv etnaviv: bound 38000000.gpu (ops gpu_ops [etnaviv]) > > > > > > > [ 12.400676] etnaviv-gpu 38000000.gpu: model: GC7000, revision: 6203 > > > > > > > [ 12.641297] [drm] Initialized etnaviv 1.3.0 20151214 for etnaviv on minor 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim, > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version of Nano do you have? Not all Nano SoC's have a GPU from > > > > > > looking at the datasheet [1] . I am using MIMX8MN2CVTIZAA (Nano Solo) > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] - https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX8MNIEC.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, > > > > > > > > > > The board I have here has MIMX8MN5CVTIZAA so i.MX 8M Nano QuadLite > > > > > with 'No GPU' as you expected. > > > > > > > > > > So I have to add the following to keep my board from hanging after your series: > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn-venice-gw7902.dts > > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn-venice-gw7902.dts > > > > > index 236f425e1570..0d256a607b7c 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn-venice-gw7902.dts > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn-venice-gw7902.dts > > > > > @@ -251,6 +251,10 @@ > > > > > }; > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > +&gpu { > > > > > + status = "disabled"; > > > > > +}; > > > > > + > > > > > &i2c1 { > > > > > clock-frequency = <100000>; > > > > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > > > > > > > > > This situation is similar to the one I encountered with the > > > > > imx8mm-venice-gw7901 where adding the GPC node caused my board (which > > > > > did not power the GPU) to hang until I added disables to the > > > > > device-tree with commit 7973009235e2 ("arm64: dts: > > > > > imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dts: disable pgc_gpumix"). It feels painful to > > > > > have to add patches to keep things from hanging after additional > > > > > functionality is added to dt but perhaps that is more common than I > > > > > think esp for SoC's like IMX8M which have a lot of lingering support > > > > > still coming in. > > > > > > > > > Yea, it's unfortunate that those patches break your board, but I guess > > > > we need to accept this, while there is still a lot of feature work > > > > going on. > > > > There are a significant number of peripherals which are defined and > > marked as 'disabled' by default, so I don't think it's unreasonable to > > do that here. > > I'd like to propose we keep the default disabled and people who > > need/want the GPU enabled can turn it on. Why waste the power if it's > > not needed? > > > Sure, if a significant number of chips has the GPU disabled, we might > want to keep it disabled in the base dtsi. With those variants it's > always a tradeoff, for example there are SKUs of the i.MX6 that had the > VPU disabled, but very few of those were in the field, so the VPUs are > enabled in the SoC base dtsi and only users of those special SKUs would > need to disable them in the board DT. > > The power argument isn't valid, as the kernel driver will suspend the > device when not needed, so there is no wasted power (aside from the > sort moment while the driver probes) with the GPU enabled. > > The rule of thumb for when a device is default enabled in the SoC dsti > has always been (at least for i.MX) that the peripheral must not have a > board level dependency. While a i2c controller obviously needs a i2c > bus connected on the board to fulfill its purpose, a GPU can be used as > color space converter or something like that with no board level > interaction. Now the line is a bit blurred by having multiple power > rails into the SoC, so one could argue that the GPUs and VPUs now have > some board level dependency on the i.MX8M*. That makes sense. Do we defer to Shawn as the final arbiter as to whether or not it's enabled/disabled? It would be nice to get Nano caught up in functionality as much as possible. adam > > Regards, > Lucas >