Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965066AbXAMHzK (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161306AbXAMHzK (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:10 -0500 Received: from smtp109.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.219]:32928 "HELO smtp109.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965076AbXAMHzJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xgcudJOuG9HFELVxYLoSSYDl2tqlmfAzw/D7Af74GbnnQp4FeM1k68p1tozK+VLczBjbUwf8/AWAVFVo57SYQsVhk1i2zfwFDwau2QxXjFGlXCNFeeiMk6Ls3pHPEqDbb5OTBryB7F232A/lLaFhliyZKDYb7FhxStvuANtaBBQ= ; X-YMail-OSG: SYFvwAcVM1nsL.oMuaTIXtsqpNUAdNp.WurJ_yh9WuTPpnuUlJYDgroq3B0G9wIY3opNt.uC_cSDzcfB94Nkkcpenbklz8cthupHPsOm.o4qzLxIVntjer_yAJlrVqBzm67jso7RHOxe9N_KoUDBzdFI4Lha3fRuGaPx.MPbXQzyUB2ThJFECZ_T_MJgqrphmofC8RjafSIe19g- Message-ID: <45A89008.2030408@yahoo.com.au> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:53:44 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , "Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" , pravin b shelar Subject: Re: High lock spin time for zone->lru_lock under extreme conditions References: <20070112160104.GA5766@localhost.localdomain> <45A86291.8090408@yahoo.com.au> <20070113073643.GA4234@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070113073643.GA4234@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1238 Lines: 35 Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:39:45PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: >>What is the "CS time"? > > > Critical Section :). This is the maximal time interval I measured from > t2 above to the time point we release the spin lock. This is the hold > time I guess. > > >>It would be interesting to know how long the maximal lru_lock *hold* time >>is, >>which could give us a better indication of whether it is a hardware problem. >> >>For example, if the maximum hold time is 10ms, that it might indicate a >>hardware fairness problem. > > > The maximal hold time was about 3s. Well then it doesn't seem very surprising that this could cause a 30s wait time for one CPU in a 16 core system, regardless of fairness. I guess most of the contention, and the lock hold times are coming from vmscan? Do you know exactly which critical sections are the culprits? -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/