Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750860AbXANAgG (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:36:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750855AbXANAgG (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:36:06 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:62652 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750860AbXANAgF (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:36:05 -0500 Subject: Re: No more "device" symlinks for classes From: Kay Sievers To: Pierre Ossman Cc: Greg KH , LKML In-Reply-To: <45A9797F.9000806@drzeus.cx> References: <45A97089.5090004@drzeus.cx> <1168732961.14924.39.camel@pim.off.vrfy.org> <45A9797F.9000806@drzeus.cx> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 01:35:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1168734951.14924.50.camel@pim.off.vrfy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:4ddcc9dd12ba6cf3155e4d81b383efda Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1804 Lines: 39 On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 01:29 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Kay Sievers wrote: > > > > The plan is to have a single unified tree at /sys/devices, where all > > device-directories live below their parents, and /sys/class contains > > only symlinks pointing into this single tree, just like /sys/bus. > > > > People want to stack class-devices, but this leads to a /sys/devices > > tree and several small trees spread around in /sys/class. These trees > > need to be connected by "device"-links and the "class:"-links, which > > just doesn't make much sense if you can have one single tree with the > > same information. > > > > In the unified tree, the "device"-link will always just point to the > > parent device, that's why there is a config option to disable these > > links and test current software not to depend on it. > > > I'm not sure I completely follow. Should an application look at the > symlink (e.g. /sys/class/fooclass/foodev -> /sys/devices/...) and follow > that one level up? If so, then this sounds a bit complicated. Especially > from shell scripts. We would have one single tree at /sys/devices, and always flat classification without hierarchy at /sys/class and /sys/bus. If you enter the device-tree by starting at /sys/class, you get the full path to the device by reading the link, and get all the device's dependencies(parents) in the devpath of the device, I can't see any problem stripping the last element of a path with a shell script. It's all implemented in current udev and HAL for quite some time and it's pretty easy. Kay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/