Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA27C433FE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234477AbhKXMGA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:06:00 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60168 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242083AbhKXMEu (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:04:50 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 478B661055; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:01:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1637755300; bh=4j8T9XMFY0MvMPHgkNFL7ILBeO7yshBWtHpd719O/PU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=izFpc7uXr4vhf04MTdXYy1oxDnr6zPKlXlOlNcyZWIPIIBJGDiiJo+AgKkNgRTVB4 daqcOBINE1E7r8phhhTt6R5+1Gn5oe/QQzXi0cGNsCQzOTOhaj/w53EgWVQsh7cMQq BnNrrfyg/TMle75xh2Pc9scdV9++Be+hgbdPWQC8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?q?Barnab=C3=A1s=20P=C5=91cze?= , Hans de Goede , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 044/162] platform/x86: wmi: do not fail if disabling fails Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:55:47 +0100 Message-Id: <20211124115659.769514738@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0 In-Reply-To: <20211124115658.328640564@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20211124115658.328640564@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Barnabás Pőcze [ Upstream commit 1975718c488a39128f1f515b23ae61a5a214cc3d ] Previously, `__query_block()` would fail if the second WCxx method call failed. However, the WQxx method might have succeeded, and potentially allocated memory for the result. Instead of throwing away the result and potentially leaking memory, ignore the result of the second WCxx call. Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210904175450.156801-25-pobrn@protonmail.com Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c index eb391a2818330..fb16c83900a02 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c @@ -367,7 +367,14 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out) * the WQxx method failed - we should disable collection anyway. */ if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status)) { - status = acpi_execute_simple_method(handle, wc_method, 0); + /* + * Ignore whether this WCxx call succeeds or not since + * the previously executed WQxx method call might have + * succeeded, and returning the failing status code + * of this call would throw away the result of the WQxx + * call, potentially leaking memory. + */ + acpi_execute_simple_method(handle, wc_method, 0); } return status; -- 2.33.0