Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC27C433FE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344557AbhKXM7r (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:59:47 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com ([209.85.167.178]:41945 "EHLO mail-oi1-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344237AbhKXM52 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:57:28 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id u74so5120765oie.8; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 04:54:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ymQHNu/HcjKJIpfHdM0oTSjwIp52WV3gOdu73KDgh+k=; b=TbA+dsYUdfwEEDYeOyEmRLu/ABtdSQtFS5lZ1NfODUR5Z4uT1ifMu3YRhC4LVnBXia o9qgpsdi07bVTS7k3zhCn16UDFjP0YXIt0X7y1OwQ8NoK8/Y7MCFxmg16ZBaqgCS4f+y 5pWlB93tEKc9Vupih5bH9KB6PVyFJSZfMJgDhpl69Z/RyJ+qV5FRJOeuLo/h0MSFZU48 1bTO+wvQHwcb/aDzhvaczMQglimhNtloVPlvc3IDs7D2ljKC671rJbkYidrOMksBd7Go rNPRMeKaY3LgludEqt1f2bwoc0xJ5vftEOhU0BJ5C8QMXHfZvTXJ/zNzwmsr1y3NUvds Xbrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531P0HeFijrQ/uO/Sbbs1zDpSqz/7JrY9oc1/se6MZD+UE0LKxdD xAmC7LTQfFxzvgTjRulii0rwvTu+B+68dc2VchwfAAR0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8E05v+Ge/qWAiqStNgjc9LY7vhBX+bqhMNBggf0tDmC955iWPx13SsafQw0l17L4KnezEStGqa+pXGnh2Cno= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:14c2:: with SMTP id f2mr5635167oiw.154.1637758458448; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 04:54:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211029122359.1.I1e23f382fbd8beb19fe1c06d70798b292012c57a@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:54:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / hibernate: Fix snapshot partial write lengths To: Evan Green Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , LKML , Linux PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:22 PM Evan Green wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:54 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:13 PM Evan Green wrote: > > > > > > Gentle bump. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:24 PM Evan Green wrote: > > > > > > > > snapshot_write() is inappropriately limiting the amount of data that can > > > > be written in cases where a partial page has already been written. For > > > > example, one would expect to be able to write 1 byte, then 4095 bytes to > > > > the snapshot device, and have both of those complete fully (since now > > > > we're aligned to a page again). But what ends up happening is we write 1 > > > > byte, then 4094/4095 bytes complete successfully. > > > > > > > > The reason is that simple_write_to_buffer()'s second argument is the > > > > total size of the buffer, not the size of the buffer minus the offset. > > > > Since simple_write_to_buffer() accounts for the offset in its > > > > implementation, snapshot_write() can just pass the full page size > > > > directly down. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Evan Green > > > > --- > > > > > > > > kernel/power/user.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c > > > > index 740723bb388524..ad241b4ff64c58 100644 > > > > --- a/kernel/power/user.c > > > > +++ b/kernel/power/user.c > > > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, > > > > if (res <= 0) > > > > goto unlock; > > > > } else { > > > > - res = PAGE_SIZE - pg_offp; > > > > + res = PAGE_SIZE; > > > > } > > > > > > > > if (!data_of(data->handle)) { > > > > -- > > > > Do you actually see this problem in practice? > > Yes. I may fire up another thread to explain why I'm stuck doing a > partial page write, and how I might be able to stop doing that in the > future with some kernel help. But either way, this is a bug. OK, patch applied as 5.16-rc material. I guess it should go into -stable kernels too?