Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751322AbXANPu5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:50:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751323AbXANPu4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:50:56 -0500 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:44119 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322AbXANPu4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:50:56 -0500 Message-ID: <45AA51D4.4030503@tmr.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:52:52 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen Organization: TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu CC: Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Choosing a HyperThreading/SMP/MultiCore kernel ? References: <8355959a0701120525m5d1a7904i56b8a8f7316883d6@mail.gmail.com> <20070112150349.GI17269@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <200701130338.l0D3chOs026407@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <45A93E97.30007@tmr.com> <200701140155.l0E1tpkB009184@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <200701140155.l0E1tpkB009184@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2015 Lines: 39 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:18:31 EST, Bill Davidsen said: >> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: >>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said: >>>> I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the >>>> kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you need a >>>> distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC >>>> bios). As long as you can boot it, any i386 or amd64 kernel with smp >>>> enabled should use all the processors present (well amd64 on the >>>> core2duo and on the p4 if it is em64t enabled). >>> amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the >>> lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets. I admit not knowing what >>> exact variant the Mac has. >> I don't believe that's correct, the Intel features page indicates all >> core2 have both 64bit and virtualization. Perhaps some of the core (no >> 2) models didn't? Even the old 930 had those features by my notes. > > My screwup - the chart I looked at managed to get the Core and Core2 series > mixed up. Here's a hopefully more canonical one: > > http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number/proc_info_table.pdf > > Does however list some Core2 that don't do virtualization (page 3, the > T5600 and T5500), which is what I think confused the author of the table > that I misread. ;) I missed those in terms of virtualization, but it seems that all core2 support "intel 64" which I assume means emt64t, and what I thought Valdis meant by "the lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets." They all do seem to have 64bit, and should run 64bit Linux just fine. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/