Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F77C43219 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355495AbhKXOep (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:34:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1355440AbhKXOem (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:34:42 -0500 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D41C3C09B199; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 05:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id BCBDA1F459B3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1637759762; bh=w5NCl88uIb7DXyRTvcGFerOK5HHq7D6Czyq4czemG7I=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=g5ex+td+/1EaqpvGy26pVFRXUqSPBFspuYS9FJ0LfcdO1Kgv4fuz/AbrbGM6ISEBL YC7KKFAbJNuN35fOti/SpTPj0SG/lLP71koRTX3m5XS4IaHUO6+lprXaUK94iDpmCy WzArE+65mEsXtyUX+UDqIGwADkyhTMy1xOzNDh4EeRBubvybpuNTjLuk1xifbGiJIf wl5T9fh5Rr4YEqnk1skSx3JPVMX+QM8Cc2gRBk4XwZc8vVzMEWu3CRFyNCAeIniAAG 6IwPzGQpe5d2s3wy4+UCuIdURQF5ao/WhGMW5cSIBqaLolNp26c4MAN4y1ctrPt2PB BjMZ26LbvnlOQ== Message-ID: <4dd8a108-013f-8d68-b5d5-138d3cf3bff0@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 10:15:52 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Content-Language: en-US To: Arnd Bergmann , Rob Landley Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , Linux-sh list , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Sergey Senozhatsky , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org References: <41206fc7-f8ce-98aa-3718-ba3e1431e320@landley.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, Às 04:49 de 24/11/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:31 AM Rob Landley wrote: >> On 11/23/21 5:38 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >> @@ -451,3 +451,4 @@ >> 446 common landlock_restrict_self sys_landlock_restrict_self >> # 447 reserved for memfd_secret >> 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease >> +449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitv > > I don't know what's going on with this one, I don't actually see > a reason why it isn't already wired up on all architectures. If we add > this, it should probably be done for all architectures at once as a > bugfix, but it's possible that this is intentionally only used on > x86 and arm. > > André, can you comment on this? > > Arnd > I've added entries for the archs that I've actually tested, but there should not be any arch-specific problems in futex_waitv. I'll submit a patch to wire it up for the remaining architectures.