Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12129C433F5 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236082AbhKYHhq (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:37:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235914AbhKYHfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:35:39 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AFEC0613ED for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:32:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id k37so14041666lfv.3 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:32:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tY0dI4JKSMqLqN8bCT5xhyliQM9cl3Za+ENI5kRKGSo=; b=MStlbuYF8XwOtaZm2IZDizPpaqNzw/O0bk5WXfDpOkji9Fo+7tKIwAdHX1Q1q2Ddn6 4wKOsAgl/kwiIf6TDdRbFcKFBoIko4gHB3sEpXZ2h92dsV+AehEE78QfLPfoS6325J4K 4jEuVVTdsl0tZBaPYqCYSH+/mBWzSLxkhq+23G/7my8i6fiU6Bd7jvvkVtjIewIznFz0 mluf8oJk+qvs0tnccQ15XopVMiFaCIaD5sqpwAHFci8jxVfmJXboeQKJzKYUZ9mjiS4s CyKtnFdE784toKoJ2yas/U8sqRsgQdvq8uc6YlKb5oST5hgnqwSUPiw7BuP4UUogoFNU lSjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tY0dI4JKSMqLqN8bCT5xhyliQM9cl3Za+ENI5kRKGSo=; b=kAxZk7p0IeK9bhF0KygrlO39t25BwC0kRsCFZMqzkmkWOm4o8872H4x6zL6xslZoWa 5Hb4cSaF8iUNucIURpQgqi/p86JFRDXVt7lyEiZ8mtKumIsceGlWFTLHnKcGYHOnk8eG 2j+J3OZmBUV3bDHNlOXB32ME+kQ8Tnr9BTWJjN1sCeo6PQKMRfV2maimA7tYnSUH71e6 ZNFKpZim7RRfJFPYifDpo+5eqjfjBWwH4G2+QdSEUvq+Y27DWATIXVKDbmKC6x4oXTFD DbGE9SkRwnDBCEAB9M2eBG/y29aS9cSkrqgvJIN5U1OzLhOAILDxY0hBirZondWUsxBM Uk+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533py+/J9Sn+8ujVhzFfWYeNFkv5rt2nxnZ0ccMZekxBXIS1tEwa 49UD39YkGdGCB3WDWMpUK7de7+n6I2UdZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXQ9uRH7aqsvlifGN5TFtW5mUpNOGPU6NkYy5ht0oPrCfiw1c4pfU6DkFusieGl3fIGNkrHw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1316:: with SMTP id x22mr1314120lfu.639.1637825541825; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.211] ([37.153.55.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m14sm179162ljg.2.2021.11.24.23.32.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:32:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/msm/dp: dp_link_parse_sink_count() return immediately if aux read failed To: Stephen Boyd , Kuogee Hsieh , robdclark@gmail.com, sean@poorly.run Cc: abhinavk@codeaurora.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1619048258-8717-1-git-send-email-khsieh@codeaurora.org> <1619048258-8717-5-git-send-email-khsieh@codeaurora.org> From: Dmitry Baryshkov Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:32:20 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/05/2021 07:35, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-04-21 16:37:38) >> Add checking aux read/write status at both dp_link_parse_sink_count() >> and dp_link_parse_sink_status_filed() to avoid long timeout delay if > > s/filed/field/ > >> dp aux read/write failed at timeout due to cable unplugged. >> >> Changes in V4: >> -- split this patch as stand alone patch >> >> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh > > Can this patch come before the one previously? And then some fixes tag > be added? Otherwise looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > Tested-by: Stephen Boyd Is this something that we still need to pursue/merge? There were changes requested for this and for the previous patch, but no new versions were posted. -- With best wishes Dmitry