Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD68C433F5 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1357142AbhKYUT5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:19:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51412 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350695AbhKYUR4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:17:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F48FC06174A; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id a18so13965163wrn.6; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:11:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hKo9HVgG3YITApnO/pIVYMfF9RSPMJZRTTgQHhBbFfc=; b=OvbLX067aXc8SoYOLUDq/EdqJxxaYK48d6peFfqvp2DAcmjzWWYAVV6m5CrS/ZTysv /Q4YNlUxv5zqb7w+0Q8X0lH6et6gOOCMn3y64Hrgc48ZrIXrlOaxKeCnLqe1bSev5uhn 1B7k/vPc8Zo9MqUjhjSlAONiOgRaYn7PG/x+HR6jfMLskfq0RbMb4qq0Yd9YO0HL7qbK KrUyiuLN0U9hUujU/qVlumz1VI1ucajErBkorIaBnkDgKHss5Ax3gQrBNLpcJK00p/gP qw5lmtesvG6sb8ATjGw6+63j9CrMi5I6+DcU/V19+uTzaR8UXl8HlaOb+/G/NyI5Q1jV gCQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hKo9HVgG3YITApnO/pIVYMfF9RSPMJZRTTgQHhBbFfc=; b=fTEl/49WlEdYYiqclRfQV63t9u/lDDbjksD/rA/+Ox1jqCvtbuEHWdE50lFjUyHnp8 DRtvE8Ji/hGijL2FRwzDoe+KZ2L40lPUTm8vvFDUniGHqelftu8uFLFBnhni1qJlSvpr TDOy924UirJ8GmFIOZ9OcBd5FWbt2KnhvuEIcDa+rE2TaQr6Y8S4vlwDwQQQc7GPgDgq iby6ZzGIMtLRttTR9tY7cDKejQyk0XM9Lk+OWAjS3UXGtpuhbc38a/N+JmHepZ8bkQAu qgfzwxDnkyDEUiIHQqF7zBvkREzFiP6XJg0avBq69++ncOLAgcMuDgyc8VjHol6AO6Ue BnkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bBpS7SvRTwq9Vtbqca6GilGanmR9weuCyMYxjJYMJ2nIqppQc ttB83HEizkqXpv5hVWRUYjI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGEfVOp80JtpOVP+efnC/MgaAhJveM96XmiU0B0eS8alBYWxNJrStATW3om/bwMyHyMmyKJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64ce:: with SMTP id f14mr7726246wri.165.1637871095752; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:11:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k8sm3519286wrn.91.2021.11.25.12.11.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:11:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:11:33 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/100] 5.4.162-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20211125092028.153766171@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211125092028.153766171@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:23:51AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.162 release. > There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:20:07 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/429 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip