Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEAEC433F5 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350529AbhKYUX4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:23:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52278 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234768AbhKYUVy (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:21:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9408C0617A0; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:14:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id b12so13996648wrh.4; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:14:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cGRbAmIntrNReggdNZPPRZCbQxv16T4ePIwmHccKtII=; b=qGhk6U6lUDkX6iODY9J/rlWrlJjsTzcluDUgPLZx/ZhjyEy/fm5dsevvfwJ6UsaZjX wejDqYw1o3KuUsXIbt5NhbfwrHMOQxaLxq2objnavwXBG+On+8ytBWEngnIuZ6Lrzx7h 93Yr4DyvNbTrO3nQy+X+w2+4j6ebMgM0ttWo0jJk9uXz4rlh+5rH7ZQZavW5OF5Y6EZk UB1YC7XVagT+jC2egknyRlXBiDQD3JCg9ePOrYFqR8F4Wt22lE1pdsj/WvNEC9fTDpCb sr/QIY9H+nAr1UlqgIN0xgklRsYjqgRLIpPI8j7m7NN9EfIwcoZXWd/eUNONkOywHr6B MIHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cGRbAmIntrNReggdNZPPRZCbQxv16T4ePIwmHccKtII=; b=x4jMuPZvKyWExU/tjHfRiNnpiIPXNy51mP29EOaHYaeQ7KKhXoK0SVAQhaJOyORFny x3pk5EoFJjoXC4y0cK6rMfUSw92BfCeEpZ2z0eyR6CI6hKROiub0+Trd8DvSRR8d+0F9 YnZ07uyjF7alfv0eL7rKtD5Vsx8YDSsg5RWcrByVKhowka1oWtff+Fdrp4MX4yVjybGc g2ZFaN6zZA9H8LnUtw6QRpMiUnl69v4jOKBdwO3iZRZ12bkkX3A2xYd9iNHVzNoD8wX2 LIZsC6FFzThiQhTbN8R+/kZqPmuzfKeVkCB0/GCEyBLZa927WxyXQqJIzfdNJObtfs8S f67g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lhlxcLxlqA4Wu+3NcEk90s1BrYbjbx5dB103RLKDYodJ/Pd7C Lky1j7oYWj5h74I5eCK8f9o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1bH0RcFBIJErZH2jKj2I70LTvQb6zLEOeB6YKXg64OyIGn+w24wOc8XhUZ97eLv7IY1yNeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:614f:: with SMTP id y15mr9385395wrt.587.1637871251449; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm3578376wmc.36.2021.11.25.12.14.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:14:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:14:09 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/153] 5.10.82-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20211125092029.973858485@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211125092029.973858485@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:23:48AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.82 release. > There are 153 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:20:04 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/430 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/427 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip