Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:36:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:36:09 -0500 Received: from h24-64-71-161.cg.shawcable.net ([24.64.71.161]:36857 "EHLO lynx.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:35:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:35:23 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger To: Jason Tackaberry Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: File size limit exceeded with mkfs Message-ID: <20011120163523.F1308@lynx.no> Mail-Followup-To: Jason Tackaberry , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1006272138.1263.3.camel@somewhere.auc.ca> <20011120113316.R1308@lynx.no> <1006288154.1863.0.camel@somewhere.auc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <1006288154.1863.0.camel@somewhere.auc.ca>; from tack@auc.ca on Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:29:14PM -0500 X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Nov 20, 2001 15:29 -0500, Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 13:33, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Several people have reported problems like this also. What happens is > > that if you are logged on as a user, then su to root, it will fail. If > > you log in directly as root, it will work. > > Yep, this is indeed the case. > > > Can you please try some intermediate kernels (2.4.10 would be a good > > start, because it had some major changes in this area, and then go > > forward and back depending whether it works or not). > > 2.4.10 does NOT work. > 2.4.9 DOES work. > > So clearly something happened in 2.4.10 which broke this. Please let me > know if I can be of any more help. That is unfortunate, since a lot of things changed in 2.4.10, so it will make tracking the change hard. Yet, I am running 2.4.13 and have no such problems (well, at least I think not). I don't have a spare partition > 2GB, but I can do the following without problems, which _should_ be the same thing: dd if=/dev/vgtest/lv of=/dev/vgtest/lv bs=4k skip=1100k seek=1100k count=1 (i.e. it reads a block and writes a block from > 4GB offset in the file, and I can do this when logged in as a non-root user, which has write access to the disk, and also when su'd to root, just in case). Can you try the above test, just to confirm that it is equivalent to your mkfs test? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/