Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EE2C433F5 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244849AbhK2Oxs (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:53:48 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:53002 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345031AbhK2Ovq (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:51:46 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10182"; a="216674772" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,273,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="216674772" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2021 06:37:14 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,273,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="499351229" Received: from eliteleevi.tm.intel.com ([10.237.54.20]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2021 06:37:11 -0800 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:29:36 +0200 (EET) From: Kai Vehmanen X-X-Sender: kvehmane@eliteleevi.tm.intel.com To: Mark Brown cc: Takashi Iwai , Stephen Rothwell , Liam Girdwood , Kai Vehmanen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Ranjani Sridharan Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the sound-current tree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20211129113554.59416109@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7 02160 Espoo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:23:07AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > Mark, could you resolve in the latter branch? > > I'll just leave them for now, Linus got angry about merging up fixes > just to resolve conflicts so if it's not an actual dependency... the asoc for-5.17 branch does have all the needed changes and the linux-next merged version seems ok. We've already sent many further changes that touch this area of code to asoc for-5.17. Let me know if some actions are needed to help. Br, Kai