Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEC9C433EF for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1380471AbhK2Sr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:47:27 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]:48258 "EHLO ams.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1380291AbhK2SpT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:45:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CAF5B815D4; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67898C53FC7; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:41:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1638211319; bh=utZ8/tjCy+a1E2RU2GANH6wVq53NnZCEWck9N9rB7fY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YLpK0crl33De0bjvQv634kff6jWNmjAUOjwpf3lbWtZN3xL1+cyw9qrcyan34CjDq NR3g/69Zv+zV/zxgJOpEKMmVnRBWzO8UR+W4RhSmy0v27RlOySAzkm0MiLulwq6fok bOzhmWdVnQPi0ZdB0SeLmPqzu6fhfuY6bvq6ONsU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Zhenhua Ma , Peter Zijlstra , Waiman Long , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.15 155/179] locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:19:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20211129181724.051544085@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20211129181718.913038547@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20211129181718.913038547@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Waiman Long [ Upstream commit d257cc8cb8d5355ffc43a96bab94db7b5a324803 ] There are some inconsistency in the way that the handoff bit is being handled in readers and writers that lead to a race condition. Firstly, when a queue head writer set the handoff bit, it will clear it when the writer is being killed or interrupted on its way out without acquiring the lock. That is not the case for a queue head reader. The handoff bit will simply be inherited by the next waiter. Secondly, in the out_nolock path of rwsem_down_read_slowpath(), both the waiter and handoff bits are cleared if the wait queue becomes empty. For rwsem_down_write_slowpath(), however, the handoff bit is not checked and cleared if the wait queue is empty. This can potentially make the handoff bit set with empty wait queue. Worse, the situation in rwsem_down_write_slowpath() relies on wstate, a variable set outside of the critical section containing the ->count manipulation, this leads to race condition where RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF can be double subtracted, corrupting ->count. To make the handoff bit handling more consistent and robust, extract out handoff bit clearing code into the new rwsem_del_waiter() helper function. Also, completely eradicate wstate; always evaluate everything inside the same critical section. The common function will only use atomic_long_andnot() to clear bits when the wait queue is empty to avoid possible race condition. If the first waiter with handoff bit set is killed or interrupted to exit the slowpath without acquiring the lock, the next waiter will inherit the handoff bit. While at it, simplify the trylock for loop in rwsem_down_write_slowpath() to make it easier to read. Fixes: 4f23dbc1e657 ("locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation") Reported-by: Zhenhua Ma Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211116012912.723980-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c index 29eea50a3e678..e63f740c2cc84 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c @@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ * atomic_long_cmpxchg() will be used to obtain writer lock. * * There are three places where the lock handoff bit may be set or cleared. - * 1) rwsem_mark_wake() for readers. - * 2) rwsem_try_write_lock() for writers. - * 3) Error path of rwsem_down_write_slowpath(). + * 1) rwsem_mark_wake() for readers -- set, clear + * 2) rwsem_try_write_lock() for writers -- set, clear + * 3) rwsem_del_waiter() -- clear * * For all the above cases, wait_lock will be held. A writer must also * be the first one in the wait_list to be eligible for setting the handoff @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ struct rwsem_waiter { struct task_struct *task; enum rwsem_waiter_type type; unsigned long timeout; + + /* Writer only, not initialized in reader */ + bool handoff_set; }; #define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \ list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list) @@ -345,12 +348,6 @@ enum rwsem_wake_type { RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED /* Waker thread holds the read lock */ }; -enum writer_wait_state { - WRITER_NOT_FIRST, /* Writer is not first in wait list */ - WRITER_FIRST, /* Writer is first in wait list */ - WRITER_HANDOFF /* Writer is first & handoff needed */ -}; - /* * The typical HZ value is either 250 or 1000. So set the minimum waiting * time to at least 4ms or 1 jiffy (if it is higher than 4ms) in the wait @@ -366,6 +363,31 @@ enum writer_wait_state { */ #define MAX_READERS_WAKEUP 0x100 +static inline void +rwsem_add_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct rwsem_waiter *waiter) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock); + list_add_tail(&waiter->list, &sem->wait_list); + /* caller will set RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS */ +} + +/* + * Remove a waiter from the wait_list and clear flags. + * + * Both rwsem_mark_wake() and rwsem_try_write_lock() contain a full 'copy' of + * this function. Modify with care. + */ +static inline void +rwsem_del_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct rwsem_waiter *waiter) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock); + list_del(&waiter->list); + if (likely(!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))) + return; + + atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF | RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count); +} + /* * handle the lock release when processes blocked on it that can now run * - if we come here from up_xxxx(), then the RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS bit must @@ -377,6 +399,8 @@ enum writer_wait_state { * preferably when the wait_lock is released * - woken process blocks are discarded from the list after having task zeroed * - writers are only marked woken if downgrading is false + * + * Implies rwsem_del_waiter() for all woken readers. */ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type, @@ -491,18 +515,25 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, adjustment = woken * RWSEM_READER_BIAS - adjustment; lockevent_cond_inc(rwsem_wake_reader, woken); + + oldcount = atomic_long_read(&sem->count); if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { - /* hit end of list above */ + /* + * Combined with list_move_tail() above, this implies + * rwsem_del_waiter(). + */ adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS; + if (oldcount & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) + adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF; + } else if (woken) { + /* + * When we've woken a reader, we no longer need to force + * writers to give up the lock and we can clear HANDOFF. + */ + if (oldcount & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) + adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF; } - /* - * When we've woken a reader, we no longer need to force writers - * to give up the lock and we can clear HANDOFF. - */ - if (woken && (atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)) - adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF; - if (adjustment) atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count); @@ -533,12 +564,12 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, * race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the * sem->count accordingly. * - * If wstate is WRITER_HANDOFF, it will make sure that either the handoff - * bit is set or the lock is acquired with handoff bit cleared. + * Implies rwsem_del_waiter() on success. */ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, - enum writer_wait_state wstate) + struct rwsem_waiter *waiter) { + bool first = rwsem_first_waiter(sem) == waiter; long count, new; lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock); @@ -547,13 +578,19 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, do { bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF); - if (has_handoff && wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) - return false; + if (has_handoff) { + if (!first) + return false; + + /* First waiter inherits a previously set handoff bit */ + waiter->handoff_set = true; + } new = count; if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) { - if (has_handoff || (wstate != WRITER_HANDOFF)) + if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) && + !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout))) return false; new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF; @@ -570,9 +607,17 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or * set the handoff bit. */ - if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) + if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) { + waiter->handoff_set = true; + lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff); return false; + } + /* + * Have rwsem_try_write_lock() fully imply rwsem_del_waiter() on + * success. + */ + list_del(&waiter->list); rwsem_set_owner(sem); return true; } @@ -953,7 +998,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat } adjustment += RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS; } - list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list); + rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter); /* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */ count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count); @@ -999,11 +1044,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat return sem; out_nolock: - list_del(&waiter.list); - if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { - atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF, - &sem->count); - } + rwsem_del_waiter(sem, &waiter); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fail); @@ -1017,9 +1058,7 @@ static struct rw_semaphore * rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) { long count; - enum writer_wait_state wstate; struct rwsem_waiter waiter; - struct rw_semaphore *ret = sem; DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); /* do optimistic spinning and steal lock if possible */ @@ -1035,16 +1074,13 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) waiter.task = current; waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE; waiter.timeout = jiffies + RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT; + waiter.handoff_set = false; raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); - - /* account for this before adding a new element to the list */ - wstate = list_empty(&sem->wait_list) ? WRITER_FIRST : WRITER_NOT_FIRST; - - list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list); + rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter); /* we're now waiting on the lock */ - if (wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) { + if (rwsem_first_waiter(sem) != &waiter) { count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count); /* @@ -1080,13 +1116,16 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) /* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */ set_current_state(state); for (;;) { - if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, wstate)) { + if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, &waiter)) { /* rwsem_try_write_lock() implies ACQUIRE on success */ break; } raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) + goto out_nolock; + /* * After setting the handoff bit and failing to acquire * the lock, attempt to spin on owner to accelerate lock @@ -1095,7 +1134,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) * In this case, we attempt to acquire the lock again * without sleeping. */ - if (wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF) { + if (waiter.handoff_set) { enum owner_state owner_state; preempt_disable(); @@ -1106,66 +1145,26 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) goto trylock_again; } - /* Block until there are no active lockers. */ - for (;;) { - if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) - goto out_nolock; - - schedule(); - lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer); - set_current_state(state); - /* - * If HANDOFF bit is set, unconditionally do - * a trylock. - */ - if (wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF) - break; - - if ((wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) && - (rwsem_first_waiter(sem) == &waiter)) - wstate = WRITER_FIRST; - - count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count); - if (!(count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK)) - break; - - /* - * The setting of the handoff bit is deferred - * until rwsem_try_write_lock() is called. - */ - if ((wstate == WRITER_FIRST) && (rt_task(current) || - time_after(jiffies, waiter.timeout))) { - wstate = WRITER_HANDOFF; - lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff); - break; - } - } + schedule(); + lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer); + set_current_state(state); trylock_again: raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); } __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - list_del(&waiter.list); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock); - - return ret; + return sem; out_nolock: __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); - list_del(&waiter.list); - - if (unlikely(wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF)) - atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF, &sem->count); - - if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) - atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count); - else + rwsem_del_waiter(sem, &waiter); + if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); wake_up_q(&wake_q); lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_fail); - return ERR_PTR(-EINTR); } -- 2.33.0