Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:21:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:21:01 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:28427 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:20:49 -0500 Subject: Re: swsusp for 2.4.14 To: pavel@suse.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Cc: swsusp@lister.fornax.hu (Swsusp mailing list), acpi@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (ACPI mailing list), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (kernel list), seasons@falcon.sch.bme.hu (Gabor Kuti) In-Reply-To: <20011121001858.B183@elf.ucw.cz> from "Pavel Machek" at Nov 21, 2001 12:18:58 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Warning. This probably corrupts memory. (All previous versinos did, > just noone noticed becuase it needed 20+ suspend/resume cycles). This > is probably best version ever, but it still corrupts data. Has anyone tried porting swsusp to user mode linux. That way you could actually "suspend" a copy, resume it in parallel with the original and compare the two memory images ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/