Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8479C433EF for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241325AbhK3MLM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:11:12 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]:47586 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236174AbhK3MLJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:11:09 -0500 Received: from ip5f5b2004.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.91.32.4] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ms1v9-0004iV-CX; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:07:39 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: wefu@redhat.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, taiten.peng@canonical.com, aniket.ponkshe@canonical.com, gordan.markus@canonical.com, guoren@linux.alibaba.com, arnd@arndb.de, wens@csie.org, maxime@cerno.tech, dlustig@nvidia.com, gfavor@ventanamicro.com, andrea.mondelli@huawei.com, behrensj@mit.edu, xinhaoqu@huawei.com, huffman@cadence.com, mick@ics.forth.gr, allen.baum@esperantotech.com, jscheid@ventanamicro.com, rtrauben@gmail.com, Anup Patel , Rob Herring , anup.patel@wdc.com, atishp04@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, guoren@kernel.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu, philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, hch@lst.de, liush@allwinnertech.com, lazyparser@gmail.com, drew@beagleboard.org, Heinrich Schuchardt , Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: add MMU Standard Extensions support for Svpbmt Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:07:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1909580.k68io2XIxi@diego> In-Reply-To: <9930802.MB9u6SvQ6m@diego> References: <20211129014007.286478-1-wefu@redhat.com> <97431cab-d67d-4bc7-e181-d64534791f03@canonical.com> <9930802.MB9u6SvQ6m@diego> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 29. November 2021, 13:06:23 CET schrieb Heiko St?bner: > Am Montag, 29. November 2021, 09:54:39 CET schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: > > On 11/29/21 02:40, wefu@redhat.com wrote: > > > From: Wei Fu > > > > > > Previous patch has added svpbmt in arch/riscv and add "riscv,svpmbt" > > > in the DT mmu node. Update dt-bindings related property here. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Fu > > > Co-developed-by: Guo Ren > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > > > Cc: Anup Patel > > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt > > > Cc: Rob Herring > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 10 ++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > > > index aa5fb64d57eb..9ff9cbdd8a85 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > > > @@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ properties: > > > - riscv,sv48 > > > - riscv,none > > > > > > + mmu: > > > > Shouldn't we keep the items be in alphabetic order, i.e. mmu before > > mmu-type? > > > > > + description: > > > + Describes the CPU's MMU Standard Extensions support. > > > + These values originate from the RISC-V Privileged > > > + Specification document, available from > > > + https://riscv.org/specifications/ > > > + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string' > > > + enum: > > > + - riscv,svpmbt > > > > The privileged specification has multiple MMU related extensions: > > Svnapot, Svpbmt, Svinval. Shall they all be modeled in this enum? > > I remember in some earlier version some way back there was the > suggestion of using a sub-node instead and then adding boolean > properties for the supported extensions. > > Aka something like > mmu { > riscv,svpbmt; > }; For the record, I'm talking about the mail from september https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAeLtUChjjzG+P8yg45GLZMJy5UR2K5RRBoLFVZhtOaZ5pPtEA@mail.gmail.com/ So having a sub-node would make adding future extensions way nicer. > > Which I guess would be a lot nicer. Also right now there is string- > comparison done on the code side, which would look way easier > when just looking for booleans in the dt instead. > > Also isn't an enum a "one-of" selection, so wouldn't work directly > for multiple extensions? > > > Heiko > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Heinrich > > > > > + > > > riscv,isa: > > > description: > > > Identifies the specific RISC-V instruction set architecture > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-riscv mailing list > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv >