Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:09:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:09:25 -0500 Received: from zipcon.net ([209.221.136.5]:31507 "HELO zipcon.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:09:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:07:15 -0800 From: Adam Feuer To: Alan Cox Cc: Pavel Machek , Swsusp mailing list , ACPI mailing list , kernel list , Gabor Kuti Subject: Re: [swsusp] Re: swsusp for 2.4.14 Message-ID: <20011120180715.N11355@sunflower.zipcon.net> In-Reply-To: <20011121001858.B183@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:24:57AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Alan Cox : > Has anyone tried porting swsusp to user mode linux. That way you could > actually "suspend" a copy, resume it in parallel with the original and > compare the two memory images ? Alan, I got swsusp-2.4.13 (from Florent) to compile on User Mode Linux 2.4.13, with a couple of changes... it seems to suspend, but will not resume afterwards... just boots normally. Suspending doesn't seem to write the swsusp signature to the swap partition... I haven't gone any farther than that yet. I can provide a diff against uml-2.4.13 if anyone is interested in helping. :-) cheers adam -- Adam Feuer http://www.pobox.com/~adamf/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/