Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932189AbXAQKD6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:03:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932214AbXAQKD6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:03:58 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:57138 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932189AbXAQKD5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:03:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:03:43 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] fix emergency reboot: call reboot notifier list if possible Message-Id: <20070117020343.8622e44d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20070117093917.GA7538@elte.hu> References: <20070117091319.GA30036@elte.hu> <20070117092233.GA30197@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070117093917.GA7538@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1603 Lines: 37 > On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:39:17 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Russell King wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:13:19AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > we dont call the reboot notifiers during emergency reboot mainly because > > > it could be called from atomic context and reboot notifiers are a > > > blocking notifier list. But actually the kernel is often perfectly > > > reschedulable in this stage, so we could as well process the > > > reboot_notifier_list. > > > > My experience has been that when there has been the need to use this > > facility, the kernel hasn't been reschedulable. [...] > > this decision is totally automatic - so if your situation happens and > the kernel isnt reschedulable, then the notifier chain wont be called > and nothing changes from your perspective. Hm, perhaps this should be > dependent on CONFIG_PREEMPT, to make sure preempt_count() is reliable? > > but from my perspective this patch fixes a real regression. > > updated patch attached below. > Making it dependent upon CONFIG_PREEMPT seems a bit sucky. Perhaps pass in some "you were called from /proc/sysrq-trigger" notification? Also, there are ways of telling if the kernel has oopsed (oops counter, oops_in_progress, etc) which should perhaps be tested. Or just learn to type `reboot -fn' ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/