Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7353DC433EF for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 02:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346132AbhLACdE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:33:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52152 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345986AbhLACdB (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:33:01 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49A2C061746 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:29:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id x43-20020a056830246b00b00570d09d34ebso33074313otr.2 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:29:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxtx.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZuXjpzpLwqfQRycZlli2uRLaCIQV5k6p+3BxzVDW+WI=; b=dlYTI7DfPmmDUa1YuX8CbqEb+6hQ5bO6iUmTUyWsP1qz1zi5RJ5wlQET/c5jtMpRrx mZFZLqT7U4aziyVqzljTvEVg3TFqXY+7ZNCO8kBZNJT5K4fF7LT1nxtvzeym5EXrK3P6 024rQHu94JzvxN9ogfsaOEf+jJKXs0BbXYOKY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZuXjpzpLwqfQRycZlli2uRLaCIQV5k6p+3BxzVDW+WI=; b=wp6BPYswxdTgnSMURBZnN8P/lRyJCNPK1cGH/OQxYC3BOY95igw+2RJ6MDsgj9Zymx nGnADGz8cOOKUGl05WkpPKVgETjOuBsqdn2H6xacqLinDLPyXIE6/GbteaZamU19p0+n 6g94GdMDH4qj4HwtXazSFCmlkVtTOY6yyZvEeCmr9IPDni+lEBU+5IcB/PvziLXnYSeZ KDFAUGe7YztO7zLt9ryMRB/DYliq7Ix0+VNq2sbHeznij+C3hWEy5rBvSd/OzvmqceTl g9WZ/3i6ilsOhLlBS3SNXMensHktyBUfhKSAFTM/wq97Bzi165HVReh7/2BoPbZ3RSTw 2EfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VswLcFZKAyETb958MNy8N8xuSpHA9i8dakp2w9xAThIC7hRom H751phQL472H2gINF/v7eP3uKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztAsZQ7GnyItpymeT7+bXoL2bJD+pv7bbuKiyzDNcugEdOnmzN9gWbORcFwtZOByh5R7r95Q== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2a88:: with SMTP id e8mr3073112otb.375.1638325780212; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:29:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora64.linuxtx.org (104-189-158-32.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net. [104.189.158.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e14sm4024821oie.7.2021.11.30.18.29.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:29:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:29:37 -0600 From: Justin Forbes To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/179] 5.15.6-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211129181718.913038547@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211129181718.913038547@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:16:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.6 release. > There are 179 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:16:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.6-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted. Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes