Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E61FC433F5 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 03:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346321AbhLADOP (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:14:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241421AbhLADOJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:14:09 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCEFC061574; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id s139so45496356oie.13; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:10:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zMoUi0+uejRQqW/6fzcBT9/YNPDb50tYTZFrptThgGw=; b=edb900FqkmW4y+bKDcUuVHkuACFkRW2bogZ+KHehBjv0HrJM8GP9wyXCtqzYsRaLfL DN4vgpFfBa0g2wmgGBWAXkqp1Y7gw4ygnjoCvAz2BpOROMasZuC1IOsAJ0c3zktIEYqo HkMiFg9e1qkQ4Q5WO2FEjDXTOr6evm5G8HMEJdnAPA2lOg+C2Tvo47VYCwzBsQggt0DN nthjVRVDA0IL1dOIFwA5iMPhiTNgug2DoG2J/QC/jppjfL0gHON8Zm2sXZvw91eyOp6z EBeH+/GO5jdh2ZbeaEoHvWM0wdvtH2feGxxGSejSd1r6+nTktp5Kgp3qzmtZ0jmfuVNl m1GA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zMoUi0+uejRQqW/6fzcBT9/YNPDb50tYTZFrptThgGw=; b=WXX/T3PCs+OQHG5e9QUm4wInz224ij88d2oDTwMk5NtmN3QtTsgbSClhEGMGWWBqLR 87pVFL6QlqLtAYREK4H70im/0hAWfy/dY8zAdNqRY3T4xhY70MBU/79u2q6OGZ0S+oVG hjoMIpWxdU+fzofsVBCbkOzRNblME2Zk/tfN/S6sWouCqKcehaN8XVUj+1b4/TXxZbRd GzpTY9LT9KizbWO3jV9uH16o0t1nL2seuGSKmnslUkI2aOC2S9oIwnFBHhJOm1LQKCbj oTvmAXrAO5xBO03eqWqV6czE6EUryRyesZHIv8h6CjGmCMEnqeqyK83zixrNk0umF6gD 1zyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pmT9fkD+ZeidnF+yNlZIRrIf7RutQqpxYsXdKLpZUMqXpfiL8 L8xvFL6Zey/Snhiedhr6b7E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4ZtgyVd1xKnTWaP/McV3auLpFHSPMCajHauJ8PhR5gDve3BtR0j9RPcY9ZEjTSigWp0r0oQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1914:: with SMTP id bf20mr3423560oib.149.1638328249363; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.0.2] ([8.48.134.30]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h14sm3337273ots.22.2021.11.30.19.10.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:10:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:10:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: [RFC 00/12] io_uring zerocopy send Content-Language: en-US To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Jonathan Lemon , "David S . Miller" , Willem de Bruijn , Eric Dumazet , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jens Axboe References: From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/30/21 8:18 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > Early proof of concept for zerocopy send via io_uring. This is just > an RFC, there are details yet to be figured out, but hope to gather > some feedback. > > Benchmarking udp (65435 bytes) with a dummy net device (mtu=0xffff): > The best case io_uring=116079 MB/s vs msg_zerocopy=47421 MB/s, > or 2.44 times faster. > > № | test: | BW (MB/s) | speedup > 1 | msg_zerocopy (non-zc) | 18281 | 0.38 > 2 | msg_zerocopy -z (baseline) | 47421 | 1 > 3 | io_uring (@flush=false, nr_reqs=1) | 96534 | 2.03 > 4 | io_uring (@flush=true, nr_reqs=1) | 89310 | 1.88 > 5 | io_uring (@flush=false, nr_reqs=8) | 116079 | 2.44 > 6 | io_uring (@flush=true, nr_reqs=8) | 109722 | 2.31 > > Based on selftests/.../msg_zerocopy but more limited. You can use > msg_zerocopy -r as usual for receive side. > ... Can you state the exact command lines you are running for all of the commands? I tried this set (and commands referenced below) and my mileage varies quite a bit. Also, have you run this proposed change (and with TCP) across nodes (ie., not just local process to local process via dummy interface)? > Benchmark: > https://github.com/isilence/liburing.git zc_v1 > > or this file in particular: > https://github.com/isilence/liburing/blob/zc_v1/test/send-zc.c > > To run the benchmark: > ``` > cd && make && cd test > # ./send-zc -4 [-p ] [-s ] -D udp > ./send-zc -4 -D 127.0.0.1 udp > ``` > > msg_zerocopy can be used for the server side, e.g. > ``` > cd /tools/testing/selftests/net && make > ./msg_zerocopy -4 -r [-p ] [-t ] udp > ``` >