Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC2CC433EF for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348676AbhLAKdB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 05:33:01 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]:36870 "EHLO ams.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348628AbhLAKc7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 05:32:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D040EB81E29; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEBF0C53FCC; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:29:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1638354576; bh=AETMMOBDPGn+QVfejghVAmHwWjI/7/bsub2Dx0V2n1k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kKgNhAT9qH3X2bUtpCTaa4PNttI8HZMuvoKs8aX6pG8r4gCGfx5dMJ9/G5IojdnF/ GWHDgbTR/TDyRo3f6cbXyTjzYQTqgN6bZFr7zUK4d1hxBtNdgteSj5cRFLCLRXJNwA /ZJBUwyY1+upcObJyXqZifHGIEweRgPdO0F8Y3T6KqKa2cwoC7yaVbNIzJmO/KPVqC Uw5O8sCg4RIjbd1HoZdVa5MVqIq8gLT59onNjcqsJA03dXd2pBHV2IYeRnMbrusKwD 0qqD0LWz+0TAsaaIOLHoNwoYmhnVIx69NoL8WVdNd+jyMtlh++pQuhxYNK2FzhE/Y3 eELnK/kXRIHDg== Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:29:32 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Bixuan Cui , open list , bpf , Networking , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , john fastabend , KP Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bpf: Add oversize check before call kvmalloc() Message-ID: References: <1638027102-22686-1-git-send-email-cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 02:53:16PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:32 AM Bixuan Cui wrote: > > > > Commit 7661809d493b ("mm: don't allow oversized kvmalloc() calls") add > > the oversize check. When the allocation is larger than what kvmalloc() > > supports, the following warning triggered: > > > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 372 at mm/util.c:597 kvmalloc_node+0x111/0x120 > > mm/util.c:597 > > Modules linked in: > > CPU: 1 PID: 372 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.15.0-syzkaller #0 > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS > > Google 01/01/2011 > > RIP: 0010:kvmalloc_node+0x111/0x120 mm/util.c:597 > > Code: 01 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 7d f7 0c 00 49 89 c5 e9 69 ff ff ff e8 60 > > 20 d1 ff 41 89 ed 41 81 cd 00 20 01 00 eb 95 e8 4f 20 d1 ff <0f> 0b e9 > > 4c ff ff ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd 53 e8 36 > > RSP: 0018:ffffc90002bf7c98 EFLAGS: 00010216 > > RAX: 00000000000000ec RBX: 1ffff9200057ef9f RCX: ffffc9000ac63000 > > RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81a6a621 RDI: 0000000000000003 > > RBP: 0000000000102cc0 R08: 000000007fffffff R09: 00000000ffffffff > > R10: ffffffff81a6a5de R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000ffff9aaa > > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000ffffffff R15: 0000000000000000 > > FS: 00007f05f2573700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > CR2: 0000001b2f424000 CR3: 0000000027d2c000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > Call Trace: > > > > kvmalloc include/linux/slab.h:741 [inline] > > map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1090 [inline] > > __sys_bpf+0x3a5b/0x5f00 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4603 > > __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4722 [inline] > > __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4720 [inline] > > __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4720 > > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] > > do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > > > The type of 'value_size' is u32, its value may exceed INT_MAX. > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+cecf5b7071a0dfb76530@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui > > --- > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > > index 1033ee8..f5bc380 100644 > > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > > @@ -1094,6 +1094,10 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr) > > } > > > > value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map); > > + if (value_size > INT_MAX) { > > + err = -EINVAL; > > -E2BIG makes a bit more sense in this scenario? kvmalloc should be fixed do not print WARN_ON() on attempts to provide such allocations sizes. We are in RDMA, and everyone who receives this size as an input from the user, seeing this type of error. Thanks > > > + goto err_put; > > + } > > > > err = -ENOMEM; > > value = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN); > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 > >