Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751850AbXAQX4Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:56:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751462AbXAQX4Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:56:16 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:5479 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254AbXAQX4P (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:56:15 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,201,1167638400"; d="scan'208"; a="170071253:sNHT50481305" Message-ID: <45AEB79B.2010205@intel.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:56:11 -0800 From: Auke Kok User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Kropelin CC: Auke Kok , Allen Parker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression) References: <20070117190448.A20184@mail.kroptech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070117190448.A20184@mail.kroptech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1995 Lines: 40 Adam Kropelin wrote: >> Allen Parker wrote: >>> Allen Parker wrote: >>>> From what I've been able to gather, other Intel Pro/1000 chipsets >>>> work fine in 2.6.20-rc5. If the e1000 guys need any assistance >>>> testing, I'll be more than happy to volunteer myself as a guinea pig >>>> for patches. >>> I wasn't aware that I was supposed to post this as a regression, so >>> changed the subject, hoping that someone will pick this up and run with >>> it. Primary issue being that link is not seen on this chipset under >>> 2.6.20-rc5 via in-tree e1000 driver, despite multiple cycles of ifconfig >>> $eth up && ethtool $eth | grep link && ifconfig $eth down. Tested on 2 >>> machines with identical hardware. >> I asked Allen to report this here. I'm working on the issue as we speak >> but for now I'll treat the link issue as a known regression once I >> confirm it. If others have seen it then I'd like to know ASAP of course > > I am experiencing the no-link issue on a 82572EI single port copper > PCI-E card. I've only tried 2.6.20-rc5, so I cannot tell if this is a > regression or not yet. Will test older kernel soon. > > Can provide details/logs if you want 'em. we've already established that Allen's issue is not due to the driver and caused by interrupts being mal-assigned on his system, possibly a pci subsystem bug. You also have a completely different board (82572EI instead of 82571EB), so I'd like to see the usual debugging info as well as hearing from you whether 2.6.19.any works correctly. On top of that I posted a patch to rc5-mm yesterday that fixes a few significant bugs in the rc5-mm driver, so please apply that patch too before trying, so we're not wasting our time finding old bugs ;) Cheers, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/