Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 11:41:17 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, cki-project@redhat.com,
        kernelci@groups.io, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Bump minimum supported version of LLVM to 11.0.0
Message-ID: <202112011140.DA93B3E@keescook>
References: <20211129165803.470795-1-nathan@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211129165803.470795-1-nathan@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:57:57AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> This patch series raises the minimum supported version of LLVM to
> 11.0.0.
> 
> Patch #1 outlines the issue, goes over the potential impact of the
> change, and does the actual bump. Subsequent patches clean up the
> various checks that are always true after the bump.
> 
> I have marked this revision as RFC to give various parties the option to
> comment on this bump before it is done, namely KernelCI and Linaro's
> LKFT, who are still testing clang-10. I have added some other folks to
> CC that I know are testing with clang to see if this impacts them in any
> way (as I would like to impact as few people as possible) but as far as
> I am aware, most other CIs and developers are testing closer to tip of
> tree. If that is not true, scream so that we can see what can be done
> about that. If I missed anyone who is actively testing with clang,
> please key them in and I will make sure to include them in future
> revisions (if any are needed).
> 
> It probably makes sense for this series to live in -mm.

Sounds good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook