MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211110105952.62013-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20211110105952.62013-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <YZJExzxJ4j8g6jEY@smile.fi.intel.com> <AS8PR04MB8946B4800AE34258F7F2BA688F989@AS8PR04MB8946.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <YZN7+UlXtJi8/i1L@smile.fi.intel.com> <YZ0WlMyS36Gj565C@smile.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <YZ0WlMyS36Gj565C@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:41:16 -0600
Message-ID: <CADRPPNT3yhr3jAPZm=hcON3nd97eLSrkWqFBV6kh6W5gf0w3Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@nxp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:38:01AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:24:36PM +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > > > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:30 AM
> > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:59:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > v2: updated Cc list based on previous changes to MAINTAINERS
> > > >
> > > > Any comments on this, please?
> > > >
> > > > I really want to decrease amount of kernel.h usage in the common headers.
> > > > So others won't copy'n'paste bad example.
> > >
> > > There seems to be no problem with the patch although I didn't get time to really compile with it applied.
> > >
> > > Will pick them up later after build test.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Note, it has two fixes against MAINTAINERS which may be sent, I believe,
> > sooner than later to Linus.
>
> Any new so far?

The build test is good.  I have applied it for next.  Thanks.

Regards,
Leo