Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B408EC433F5 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 20:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352881AbhLAUVf (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:21:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42864 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238230AbhLAUVD (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:21:03 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B3AC061758; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id l16so54875281wrp.11; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:17:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bZLA4Cc1gP5Q5im8BpOiaRiaj3XtOM5lk5oHTlIAmW0=; b=ZVZ+DEdS+bicoTkpu0maw3d+X/nOU8wwm0AQ5C3EEUC2pj3o7s7HHj/V3oY0XKYodk TsDXu+Wz1g1nDlI5nwcn5LXOY50HXdbFCm7FnWBj4EkjOMVxBVC78vNKRIMjoRaqTSH5 zEwZL7lYGKar8s2j4I52Qv3RtsR2Ab+yhKe/F7U0AZD6hjEeuD7VYaznuTmc7ISoAt6V 0KwrDr2RjP9rq9E3HYIYyDYUqKcBirbaZzm2Zq4uQJmAbvdvH4Q5Z75NS6r/13tyOGDL efJ4Ysx1KKpxIAqW1rCN8LJoaZSDZHOiV6qgYzWxZOkRnj0gnefy4hLXl3z8xcDTDfkJ 3fqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bZLA4Cc1gP5Q5im8BpOiaRiaj3XtOM5lk5oHTlIAmW0=; b=aunLLUqN3AyRTPV3yYpOf00hDXVGePUWs+2DODBQLdoHEMqBQiCr4UQO5dsE/A9cB7 +ZJPq0MdI9l5rBKv08iJtYjxsLVnRwL8WG07r+D0Jf+Zojh/vpQ6Zl7nEueTT2wWJfxn q5XZDqqXg5jkd1H2A7aERC9gLvlK5nmpZw14HT8Zqhn1cgf9nvPI8qYn7FMh1wJ9n1Im l2RA5OVERjVNxnSSss/XG3P2xFEj9mcQCkvCs2/I1xhIcmft1aL058hhxD0SrVEMAB82 YYHiZSJq0lq9JRHqb7KqyKt86zfIPmjlTSYLiqXsoENcQtZ8PvTJbiPJbN4a3KG+GZ4r qihA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hFg0MvXC5o5nRMSJuAwoVf/EGsz0w9hIO1+HcyUFK1Z1zLK5A zUstQKbnUMbXbhVswr70C6E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwD6JDD0zm0cHanRMt7tWmYrkBb4yRD+fKjnOQ1VT+EIXc++sg6IJ5LgSfXGPRY1RQKuRG2rA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2a2:: with SMTP id l2mr9226808wry.110.1638389860790; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.8.198] ([185.69.144.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f15sm332710wmg.30.2021.12.01.12.17.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:17:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 20:17:34 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [RFC 05/12] net: optimise page get/free for bvec zc Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , "David S . Miller" , Willem de Bruijn , Eric Dumazet , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jens Axboe References: <72608c13553a1372e7f6f7a32eb53d5d4b23a1fc.1638282789.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> <20211201192043.tqed7rtwibnwhw7c@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Pavel Begunkov In-Reply-To: <20211201192043.tqed7rtwibnwhw7c@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/1/21 19:20, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 03:18:53PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >> get_page() in __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec() and matching put_page()s are >> expensive. However, we can avoid it if the caller can guarantee that >> pages stay alive until the corresponding ubuf_info is not released. >> In particular, it targets io_uring with fixed buffers following the >> described contract. >> >> Assuming that nobody yet uses bvec together with zerocopy, make all >> calls with bvec iterators follow this model. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov >> --- [...] >> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c >> index b23db60ea6f9..b7b087815539 100644 >> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c >> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c >> @@ -666,10 +666,14 @@ static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb) >> &shinfo->dataref)) >> goto exit; >> >> - skb_zcopy_clear(skb, true); >> + if (!(shinfo->flags & SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS)) { >> + for (i = 0; i < shinfo->nr_frags; i++) >> + __skb_frag_unref(&shinfo->frags[i], skb->pp_recycle); >> + } else { >> + shinfo->flags &= ~SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS; >> + } >> >> - for (i = 0; i < shinfo->nr_frags; i++) >> - __skb_frag_unref(&shinfo->frags[i], skb->pp_recycle); >> + skb_zcopy_clear(skb, true); > > It would be better if all of this logic was moved into the callback > under zcopy_clear. Note that this path is called for both TX and RX. Yeah, can be done and removes the extra if from non-zc path. Thanks! -- Pavel Begunkov