Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:43:32 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc:     Alexey Avramov <hakavlad@inbox.lv>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to
 make progress
Message-ID: <20211202094332.GW3366@techsingularity.net>
References: <20211125151853.8540-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
 <20211127011246.7a8ac7b8@mail.inbox.lv>
 <20211129150117.GO3366@techsingularity.net>
 <20211201010348.31e99637@mail.inbox.lv>
 <20211130172754.GS3366@techsingularity.net>
 <20211201033836.4382a474@mail.inbox.lv>
 <20211201140005.GU3366@techsingularity.net>
 <20211201172920.GA8492@magnolia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211201172920.GA8492@magnolia>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:20AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Again 5.16-rc1 stuttered badly but the new patch was comparable to 5.15.
> > 
> > As my baseline figures are very different to yours due to differences in
> > storage, can you test the following please?
> 
> I don't know if this was directed at me, but I reran my swapfile
> testcase on 5.16-rc3 and found that it had nearly the same runtime as it
> did in 5.15.
> 

Thanks Darrick. Can I add the following?

Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs