Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20211202102814.793d2f67@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <f6e96a47-01a3-96f3-1ed7-e9a42c2b26bf@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:04:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211202102814.793d2f67@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 02/12/2021 00:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> drivers/powercap/dtpm.c: In function 'init_dtpm':
> drivers/powercap/dtpm.c:466:21: error: unused variable 'dtpm_descr' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>   466 |  struct dtpm_descr *dtpm_descr;
>       |                     ^~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   f751db8adaea ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Disable DTPM at boot time")

Rafael, will you drop the patch from your tree and I send a new one with
the local variable also, or shall I send a change on top of?

> 
> I have used the pm tree from next-20211201 for today.
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog