Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:22:05 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] topology/sysfs: only export used sysfs attributes
Message-ID: <YajWjasdqnibSRJm@osiris>
References: <20211129130309.3256168-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
 <YaTdpsVCDQMlscON@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YaTdpsVCDQMlscON@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:03:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:03:06PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > v2:
> > As requested by Greg KH: avoid negative logic and use uppercase defines.
> > 
> > v1:
> > Create die and cluster cpu topology sysfs attributes only if an
> > architecture makes uses of it, instead of creating them always for all
> > architectures with bogus default values.
> > Also change the book and drawer cpu topology macros so they match all
> > all other topology macros.
> > 
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211128212221.1069726-1-hca@linux.ibm.com/
> > 
> > Heiko Carstens (3):
> >   topology/sysfs: export die attributes only if an architectures has support
> >   topology/sysfs: export cluster attributes only if an architectures has support
> >   topology/sysfs: rework book and drawer topology ifdefery
> > 
> >  Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst | 33 +++++++++++------------
> >  drivers/base/topology.c                   | 28 ++++++++++++++-----
> >  include/linux/topology.h                  | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> Seems entirely reasonable to me,
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Since there seem to be no objections, who should pick this up?
I'd assume the s390 tree would not be appropriate.

Andrew, Greg, Peter?