Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9060C433EF for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1376504AbhLBSCd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:02:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57074 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231154AbhLBSCb (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:02:31 -0500 Received: from nbd.name (nbd.name [IPv6:2a01:4f8:221:3d45::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE8CC06174A; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:59:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbd.name; s=20160729; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Subject: From:References:Cc:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PbNRTWvVFrQhSfiFmSEKFvbhIel4YjxA0wnIzvHb8r0=; b=E/oitWV4Vohr250EjbMQbna/JR chMwbzdnr9hplbVWpNh6OpTMETeCCIS8oFoItBPiwA74gexrdYw/muEeMadTPKkaElBa3TcEe9HAE SRCUs9PTaR4oeCGIDAf2BKfvaV0K1kELPcyuSNzFmZZ/dVhNJw9uicqnfBzxm+13IGv4=; Received: from p54ae943f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.174.148.63] helo=nf.local) by ds12 with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1msqMK-0001s4-RS; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 18:59:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , john@phrozen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org References: <20211129153330.37719-1-nbd@nbd.name> <20211129153330.37719-13-nbd@nbd.name> From: Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] gpio: Add support for Airoha EN7523 GPIO controller In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-12-02 02:47, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi Felix! > > Thanks for your patch! > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:54 PM Felix Fietkau wrote: > >> From: John Crispin >> >> Airoha's GPIO controller on their ARM EN7523 SoCs consists of two banks of 32 >> GPIOs. Each instance in DT is for an single bank. >> >> Signed-off-by: John Crispin >> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau > > (...) >> +config GPIO_EN7523 >> + tristate "Airoha GPIO support" >> + depends on ARCH_AIROHA >> + default ARCH_AIROHA >> + select GPIO_GENERIC > > Yes that looks applicable, but why isn't it used? > > The few 32-bit registers look like an ideal candidate for > using the generic GPIO. Check similar drivers such as > drivers/gpio/gpio-ftgpio010.c and how it uses > bgpio_init() and the nice doc for bgpio_init() in > drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c. I just looked at the datasheet and the driver code again, and I think EN7523 is too strange for proper generic GPIO support. For each bank there are two control registers (not consecutive), which have 2-bit fields for every GPIO line to control direction. No idea why 2 bits per line, because only values 0 and 1 are valid, the rest are reserved. For lines configured as output, an extra output-enable bit also needs to be set in a separate register before output values can be written. The code does use bgpio to read/write values, but that's about it. I don't think it would do the generic GPIO code any good to support this weirdness. - Felix