Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:22:03 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] ima: limit including fs-verity's file digest in
 measurement list
Message-ID: <YalHCz/FzQXKHx4u@sol.localdomain>
References: <20211202215507.298415-1-zohar@linux.ibm.com>
 <20211202215507.298415-4-zohar@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211202215507.298415-4-zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 04:55:05PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Without the file signature included in the IMA measurement list, the type
> of file digest is unclear.  Set up the plumbing to limit including
> fs-verity's file digest in the IMA measurement list based on whether the
> template name is ima-sig.  In the future, this could be relaxed to include
> any template format that includes the file signature.
> 

Does it make sense to tie IMA's fs-verity support to files having signatures?
What about IMA audit mode?  I thought that is just about collecting hashes, and
has nothing to do with signatures.

- Eric