Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B75FC433F5 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352370AbhLCNuj (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:50:39 -0500 Received: from marcansoft.com ([212.63.210.85]:52918 "EHLO mail.marcansoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238055AbhLCNui (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:50:38 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcan@marcan.st) by mail.marcansoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1B6C41E96; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:47:10 +0000 (UTC) To: Rob Herring Cc: Marc Zyngier , Alyssa Rosenzweig , Lorenzo Pieralisi , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=c5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , PCI , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20211122111332.72264-1-marcan@marcan.st> <8e881b80-614c-dccf-ddaf-895d1acf26c7@marcan.st> <7f6928fc-97fd-cbe8-f7e9-954945b4574b@marcan.st> From: Hector Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: apple: Configure link speeds properly Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 22:47:08 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: es-ES Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/12/2021 23.33, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>> + max_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(port->np); >>>>>> + if (max_gen < 0) { >>>>>> + dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "max link speed not specified\n"); >>>>> >>>>> Better to fail than limp along in gen1? Though you don't check the >>>>> return value... >>>>> >>>>> Usually, the DT property is there to limit the speed when there's a >>>>> board limitation. >>>> >>>> The default *setting* is actually Gen4, but without >>>> PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL poked it always trains at Gen1. Might make >>>> more sense to only set the LNKCTL field if max-link-speed is specified, >>>> and unconditionally poke that bit. That'll get us Gen4 by default (or >>>> even presumably Gen5 in future controllers, if everything else stays >>>> compatible). >>> >>> You already do some setup in firmware for ECAM, right? I think it >>> would be better if you can do any default setup there and then >>> max-link-speed is only an override for the kernel. >> >> I thought the PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL thing had to be set later, >> but trying it now I realized we were missing a bit of initialization >> that was causing it not to work. Indeed it can be done there and we can >> drop it from the kernel. >> >> We could even do the max-link-speed thing in m1n1 if we want. It has >> access to the value from the ADT directly, which to be correct we'd have >> to dynamically transplant to the DT, since there's at least one device >> that has different PCIe devices on one port depending on hardware >> variant, while sharing a devicetree. If we're okay with the kernel just >> not implementing this feature for now, we can say it's the bootloader's job. >> >> Ultimately we ship the DTs along with m1n1, so there's an argument that >> if some day we need to override the max-link-speed for whatever reason >> over what the ADT says, well, we'd be shipping the updated DT along with >> m1n1 anyway, so we might as well make m1n1 do it... if so, it might make >> sense to drop those properties from the actual DTs we ship altogether, >> at least for now. >> >> If we decide to make it m1n1's job entirely, we can drop this patch >> altogether, at least for now (I can't say how this will interact with >> suspend/resume and other power management, and hotplug... but we'll open >> that can of worms when we get there). > > Shouldn't you be setting PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS and/or PCI_EXP_LNKCAP2 if > you need to limit the max speed and then you can use that instead of > max-link-speed? If that's lost in low power modes, the driver just has > to save and restore it. Those registers aren't writable as far as I can tell. All we can do is set LNKCTL2 to tell the hardware what actual max speed to use, the same thing this patch does. -- Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st) Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub