Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990FEC433FE for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 16:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1382224AbhLCQzk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:55:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58282 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352889AbhLCQzk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:55:40 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B7AC061751; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t23so6969660oiw.3; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:52:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y3kND0JWuv17IoM/sVq9SwFXUCMZwIS/XbeDe0iK9O8=; b=nUc6VrAFXTlirzOfUH9m3h89phlfg/mlC/9jys5RuNWB8Ltq2FrRIaz6mdk/5qLGtW x0QY59sn9Uyeq1lhsR/19IucI89RR4A5dTfY/MzfK0yzbjWnZz2GHpsAd+RzHeQnwJXl ZkTrpt1bMNWGmM446S7AYtLKpcEC9poteEFJUec+3tdiWB6ddhSfAykjk/TTDrGuKlqP n59Q0SvfnvDNS8ji61JD7I3ZVCvyAPdFC8oOTB6VHG5pqxCRZN8bbDsgo1qHcmUu9LRT d39dx5ZcmQsMNMkcPG6hRFI7mUk52WGqpo18GnNIIzhFEVKUPb2T38JoJa7AKtJzMtmc UeMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y3kND0JWuv17IoM/sVq9SwFXUCMZwIS/XbeDe0iK9O8=; b=2dMQxotWx8qi5AMZpVhlNXsiQTbolhfzjX4Ci+uPLmLdvb5ThoaFTDCbm3XhbCWibx xMoItPgQu2uz2XvX3lahQzzVT+GywaGiifuHmz0COgJyirXEFYzbZV3pzPlH12a+Lo5e jYvWkYA6kh8qRHoZvnin3ekK+R/QKzxQt0AWUGdW14j6hCpyJe7EwTC1EsCIZNgOS13a 4REySPpQl7hlzyoZNV6zRW/Ep70WJfxsr9CTceyQO564p4CxFMCf1pVxQPOpBA1qcxr4 SxspHsen4IJXTc2WXHH+7gQ2JUUNp6crXIcuKeOzlGxnvTuDy2aYtMASRRBEDI2c519F faHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vJlvBRINeG5oY2pEhH3fL+74Yp+ZEP3OcLzDq6Mfy4gF6cGYH XLD7J6h9D7que1EzJonny2kzfs0Qgl0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfihtEVi4VnJAw6xrFpgT0S+LoX9yuoVA/2JX3SvwtZOj6+taEjIxWulknrqEz2xc8t4xidA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:accd:: with SMTP id v196mr11073423oie.108.1638550335100; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y192sm744443oie.21.2021.12.03.08.52.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:52:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] watchdog: da9062: Correct the timeout values To: Christoph Niedermaier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Support Opensource , Adam Thomson , Wim Van Sebroeck , Andrej Picej , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211203163539.91870-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:52:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211203163539.91870-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/3/21 8:35 AM, Christoph Niedermaier wrote: > I measured the timeout values of my DA9061 chip. According to the > information in the data sheet the formula should be: > > timeout = 2.048 * 2^(regval - 1) > > But my measured values differ from that. > Accoring to my measured values the formula must be: > > timeout = 3.2 * 2^(regval - 1) > > Is there something wrong with my chip, or has anyone else noticed this as well? The driver assumes a static and well defined clock rate. Maybe that rate is different in your system (if that is possible) ? Guenter > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier > Cc: Support Opensource > Cc: Adam Thomson > Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck > Cc: Guenter Roeck > Cc: Andrej Picej > Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > --- > drivers/watchdog/da9062_wdt.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/da9062_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/da9062_wdt.c > index f02cbd530538..d2576aba9ca5 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/da9062_wdt.c > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/da9062_wdt.c > @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ > #include > #include > > -static const unsigned int wdt_timeout[] = { 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 65, 131 }; > +static const unsigned int wdt_timeout[] = { 0, 3, 6, 12, 25, 51, 102, 204 }; > + > #define DA9062_TWDSCALE_DISABLE 0 > #define DA9062_TWDSCALE_MIN 1 > #define DA9062_TWDSCALE_MAX (ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_timeout) - 1) >