Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6B1C433EF for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1382342AbhLCRh6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 12:37:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39974 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343518AbhLCRh4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 12:37:56 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCCDC061751 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:34:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989A1B828D6 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77E2AC53FAD; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:34:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1638552870; bh=WHTBc4bgkCtBeEhRXEgFiz4s5kKd4i8rh+TOXdUqZJY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GVrlZDTQZV7r3Hi+G/5SPgmOHvHCCsgPx3SiNvOWU1VkhlHEnR9KCf8MzUvbROnvQ pGMDwShFgRbunhVW76WvIYMb4g7cMJ+XveF7oR7X78f5IyscuWVvQ/MvyVIVtDKRUn 3Kesbb0/K6VxIfmcpZzVmL+7wIcePSbGA5jBFOTPvi0BtYoHFQs0wW+0w3NzKrhjyU 0Tc75DoN8dJM54SsIDmomSdwSoTjU3sGyQMMRVDnM2+2f4F+1SQK7J1E5X/D4nT5Pz WhbxH60D0VJc3DMFt7LVUyqRhZSfAVyYY2UYryqyVmGDSKX3HFGvR6zaAfiDYE147a 4CivT/QABHpAA== Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:34:23 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Ariel D'Alessandro Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, bkylerussell@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] Support BCLK input clock in tlv320aic31xx Message-ID: References: <20211119153248.419802-1-ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com> <163762561675.2471742.16439171676950432106.b4-ty@kernel.org> <6a2ff1f0-ebd9-be6d-9b2c-5704edd7c25d@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0HmQJ345lS0f+Xyw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6a2ff1f0-ebd9-be6d-9b2c-5704edd7c25d@collabora.com> X-Cookie: Don't get mad, get interest. Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --0HmQJ345lS0f+Xyw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:25:17PM -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote: > On 11/22/21 9:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they > > should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing > > patches will not be replaced. > I gotta send a fix for one of the patches. So, should it be a new > incremental patch or I can still send a patchset v2? See above. --0HmQJ345lS0f+Xyw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmGqVR8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BVOgf/XdVufglD/qP9remM5BJT0aYWhxGy2k/SnulImK+rVelJFADnkoCZr+tr acRDTwVyTzcLaXjqzLy18Q5EyBKOan9TBayKNN3kiv60LMacGJZ3Vh+1A31tMns/ qxnKMQ2yOHQp+43Fy5l446Q8gNVfSbBSnr6uhuPXrLqPadPfvm8h7o0o/aqr1q+x lBu9YRqlZLwtuCOv80lgGtoCjstbLlAcPZqgnzX3VKu76H83cfHjLk+n2s4PO3Uw q76pYz7sxKaWLJlLw+2DLN2Yf1S3JD7rTHxXhohtrGQFnoAd0wOcD36ezRRERVux b7lFaTv8PgmD40D1j+UIWK1CRm6kQA== =nhC3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0HmQJ345lS0f+Xyw--