Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932857AbXASONu (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:13:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932866AbXASONu (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:13:50 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:2162 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932857AbXASONt (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:13:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:13:55 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Pekka Enberg Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: can someone explain "inline" once and for all? Message-ID: <20070119141355.GM9093@stusta.de> References: <84144f020701190501x5d1efb49u87dc9537bfe1e791@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84144f020701190501x5d1efb49u87dc9537bfe1e791@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1930 Lines: 45 On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:01:44PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 1/19/07, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >is there a simple explanation for how to *properly* define inline > >routines in the kernel? and maybe this can be added to the > >CodingStyle guide (he mused, wistfully). > > AFAIK __always_inline is the only reliable way to force inlining where > it matters for correctness (for example, when playing tricks with > __builtin_return_address like we do in the slab). > > Anything else is just a hint to the compiler that might be ignored if > the optimizer thinks it knows better. With the current implementation in the kernel (and considering that CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING was implemented in a way that it never had any effect), __always_inline and inline are currently equivalent. __always_inline is mostly an annotation that really bad things might happen if the code doesn't get inlined. But I'm not sure whether such a distinction is required at all - the rule of thumb should be that static functions in headers should be inline (otherwise, they belong into a C file), and functions in C files should never be marked inline. [1] cu Adrian [1] For the latter there might be a handful of exceptions in the whole kernel in real fastpath code, but usually gcc knows best when to inline a function - and we have a global CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE knob for influencing the decision. -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/