Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B16C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241358AbhLFJqJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 04:46:09 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:4196 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241285AbhLFJqI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 04:46:08 -0500 Received: from fraeml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4J6yzQ4Bqwz67vnQ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:38:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by fraeml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 10:42:37 +0100 Received: from [10.47.82.161] (10.47.82.161) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:42:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Fix phys_to_virt() usage on dma_addr_t To: , , , CC: , , References: <1637940933-107862-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> From: John Garry Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:42:23 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.47.82.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml721-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.72) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/11/2021 10:46, Ajish.Koshy@microchip.com wrote: > Thanks John for the update. Based on the given issue, > we never tested on arm server. > > Further arm testing will depend on the availability of > the server. > > Meanwhile will do further test on x86 and update > on the observations. Have you tested on x86 with the IOMMU enabled? From my limited experience, out of the box the IOMMU is disabled in the BIOS on x86 machines - that is a very general statement. But this is not just an issue specific to arm64. Thanks, John