Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 04:14:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 04:14:33 -0500 Received: from a59178.upc-a.chello.nl ([62.163.59.178]:60177 "EHLO www.unternet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 04:14:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:12:45 +0100 From: Frank de Lange To: Hans Reiser Cc: Frank de Lange , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Yury Yu. Rupasov" , Chris Mason Subject: Re: Abysmal interactive performance on 2.4.linus Message-ID: <20011121101245.A5454@unternet.org> In-Reply-To: <20011112205551.A14132@unternet.org> <3BF02BA4.D7E2D70E@mandrakesoft.com> <20011112235642.A17544@unternet.org> <3BFB6B09.1060103@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BFB6B09.1060103@namesys.com>; from reiser@namesys.com on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:51:21AM +0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:51:21AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > Yura, see if you can reproduce this and analyze the cause. If I > understand correctly, he is saying the problem is not throughput but > latency. Is that correct Frank? Once Yura reproduces it, I will > speculate as to the cause. Correct. -- WWWWW _______________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / \ ##---# _/ \ #### \ +31-320-252965 / \ lkml-frank@unternet.org / ------------------------- [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/