Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53573C433F5 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242890AbhLFMPs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 07:15:48 -0500 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:50250 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242106AbhLFMPr (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 07:15:47 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id 9DA451F43FC1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1638792738; bh=H1N5xvnP6xPf/7ipNiSUWtIxodNptQu0CfX5Bidi4rA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=dI8Vm9mmkkIcBocxKjqLigBAfcB/cuwc9Mytadg8YxvC9mFd5bQoyEaCGmCHK6yNA OuECmKfNEwI0NYKe7hRI2vt/B66sCcvIc1p1EazkeFismSSzG0qLQ73Ue3d/lwL9gV j9U4wjjLBf2VUcy/nmQiC0tdx4ZAwpK9bQbjK04FKJ9tA6QK+wdR07wK0DIXNcYdiZ OI+OW84gG0V3qRJK2kjrlIc9WA2+jXZHjdpEkMESqEoKoIYsM+Itw0JiNvtrj37eaR 9dr+deI4QdmCqHU++Uzj2bqiF7jspskL1fLJS5xhVy4sqWVThYSSxeIYp3pBv27v4H lUfye2U896C4Q== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:12:11 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Fix a faulty comment. Content-Language: en-US To: 6812skiii@gmail.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211204181458.10076-1-6812skiii@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: <20211204181458.10076-1-6812skiii@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jangwoong, Thanks for your patch! However... Às 15:14 de 04/12/21, 6812skiii@gmail.com escreveu: > From: Jangwoong Kim <6812skiii@gmail.com> > > We return 1, not the index of futex woken up. > > Signed-off-by: Jangwoong Kim <6812skiii@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/futex/waitwake.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c > index 4ce0923f1ce3..d148e5d4956b 100644 > --- a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c > +++ b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c > @@ -455,8 +455,8 @@ static int futex_wait_multiple_setup(struct futex_vector *vs, int count, int *wo > > /* > * Even if something went wrong, if we find out that a futex > - * was woken, we don't return error and return this index to > - * userspace > + * was woken, we don't return error and make userspace aware > + * of this by returning 1. We return to userspace the value at *woken, so your fix is wrong. Have a look at futex_wait_multiple(): ret = futex_wait_multiple_setup(vs, count, &hint); if (ret) { if (ret > 0) { /* A futex was woken during setup */ ret = hint; } return ret; } When we return 1 at futex_wait_multiple_setup(), we end up returning the hint/woken value to userspace. Let me know if you have questions. André