Message-ID: <f9537e3b0019677a8e73ab59a215094262f84dd6.camel@puri.sm>
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/19] devfreq: imx8m-ddrc: Add late system sleep PM ops
From:   Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Date:   Mon, 06 Dec 2021 13:33:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <YaaENEqlQbW8W6PI@ryzen>
References: <1631554694-9599-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com>
         <1631554694-9599-7-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com>
         <e9a3a64dcfec858e612037199df7627b77ececd9.camel@puri.sm>
         <YaaENEqlQbW8W6PI@ryzen>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Am Dienstag, dem 30.11.2021 um 22:06 +0200 schrieb Abel Vesa:
> On 21-11-10 13:15:26, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > Am Montag, dem 13.09.2021 um 20:38 +0300 schrieb Abel Vesa:
> > > Seems that, in order to be able to resume from suspend, the dram
> > > rate
> > > needs to be the highest one available. Therefore, add the late
> > > system
> > > suspend/resume PM ops which set the highest rate on suspend and
> > > the
> > > latest one used before suspending on resume.
> > 
> > Hi Abel, wouldn't this mean that s2idle / freeze would be kind of
> > broken by this?
> > 
> 
> Nope. Only the DDR rate needs to be raised at 800M before suspending.
> Everything else stays the same.

fyi I just tested this and you're right. freezes when not at 800M. So
for this patchset, I think this is fine as it enables and fixes stuff.

It would not hurt to mention s2idle at least, where of course 800M
should not be selected, as no userspace is running at all. But I'd be
fine with looking at that later.

> 
> > Does is make sense to test the lowest rate? How would I force that
> > here? (just for testing)
> 
> You can try, but it will surely freeze. See [1] what you need to
> change
> for testing.
> > 
> > Also, you could think about splitting this series up a bit and do
> > this
> > patch seperately onto mainline (before or after the other work).
> > 
> 
> Well, I sent as RFC until now. Seems there are no big issues with the
> approach. So I'll split the patches between subsystems on the next
> iteration.
> 
> > thank you
> >                           martin
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/devfreq/imx8m-ddrc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/imx8m-ddrc.c
> > > b/drivers/devfreq/imx8m-
> > > ddrc.c
> > > index f18a5c3c1c03..f39741b4a0b0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/devfreq/imx8m-ddrc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/imx8m-ddrc.c
> > > @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct imx8m_ddrc {
> > >         struct clk *dram_alt;
> > >         struct clk *dram_apb;
> > >  
> > > +       unsigned long suspend_rate;
> > > +       unsigned long resume_rate;
> > >         int freq_count;
> > >         struct imx8m_ddrc_freq
> > > freq_table[IMX8M_DDRC_MAX_FREQ_COUNT];
> > >  };
> > > @@ -271,6 +273,22 @@ static int imx8m_ddrc_target(struct device
> > > *dev,
> > > unsigned long *freq, u32 flags)
> > >         return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int imx8m_ddrc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct imx8m_ddrc *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +
> > > +       priv->resume_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->dram_core);
> > > +
> > > +       return imx8m_ddrc_target(dev, &priv->suspend_rate, 0);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int imx8m_ddrc_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct imx8m_ddrc *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +
> > > +       return imx8m_ddrc_target(dev, &priv->resume_rate, 0);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int imx8m_ddrc_get_cur_freq(struct device *dev, unsigned
> > > long
> > > *freq)
> > >  {
> > >         struct imx8m_ddrc *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > @@ -324,6 +342,9 @@ static int imx8m_ddrc_init_freq_info(struct
> > > device *dev)
> > >  
> > >                 if (dev_pm_opp_add(dev, freq->rate * 250000, 0))
> > >                         return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > +               if (index ==  0)
> 
> [1] Change this line to:
>                     if (index == 1)
> 
> It will select the 166935483 freq for suspending.
> 
> > > +                       priv->suspend_rate = freq->rate * 250000;
> > >         }
> > >  
> > >         return 0;
> > > @@ -399,11 +420,16 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > > imx8m_ddrc_of_match[] = {
> > >  };
> > >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx8m_ddrc_of_match);
> > >  
> > > +static const struct dev_pm_ops imx8m_ddrc_pm_ops = {
> > > +       SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(imx8m_ddrc_suspend,
> > > imx8m_ddrc_resume)
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static struct platform_driver imx8m_ddrc_platdrv = {
> > >         .probe          = imx8m_ddrc_probe,
> > >         .driver = {
> > >                 .name   = "imx8m-ddrc-devfreq",
> > > -               .of_match_table = imx8m_ddrc_of_match,
> > > +               .pm = &imx8m_ddrc_pm_ops,
> > > +               .of_match_table =
> > > of_match_ptr(imx8m_ddrc_of_match),
> > >         },
> > >  };
> > >  module_platform_driver(imx8m_ddrc_platdrv);
> > 
> >