Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965354AbXATT7O (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:59:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965361AbXATT7O (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:59:14 -0500 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:7659 "EHLO pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965354AbXATT7N (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:59:13 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:59:07 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5 In-reply-to: <1169305408.4199.3.camel@pi.pomac.com> To: pomac@vapor.com Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, B.Steinbrink@gmx.de, s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk, chunkeey@web.de Message-id: <45B2748B.4060106@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <1169305408.4199.3.camel@pi.pomac.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1510 Lines: 43 Ian Kumlien wrote: > Hi, > > I went from 2.6.19+sata_nv-adma-ncq-v7.patch, with no problems and adama > enabled, to 2.6.20-rc5, which gave me problems almost instantly. > > I just thought that it might be interesting to know that it DID work > nicely. > > CC since i'm not on the ml > (I'm ccing more of the people who reported this) Well that's interesting.. The only significant change that went into 2.6.20-rc5 in that driver that wasn't in that version you mentioned was this one: http://www2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2dec7555e6bf2772749113ea0ad454fcdb8cf861 Could you (or anyone else) test what happens if you take the 2.6.20-rc5 version of sata_nv.c and try it on 2.6.19? That would tell us whether it's this change or whether it's something else (i.e. in libata core). Assuming that still doesn't work, can you then try removing these lines from nv_host_intr in 2.6.20-rc5 sata_nv.c and see what that does? /* bail out if not our interrupt */ if (!(irq_stat & NV_INT_DEV)) return 0; as that's the difference I'm most suspicious of causing the problem. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/