Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751242AbXAUHW0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:22:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751283AbXAUHW0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:22:26 -0500 Received: from mx0.karneval.cz ([81.27.192.17]:54515 "EHLO av3.karneval.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751242AbXAUHWZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:22:25 -0500 From: Pavel Pisa To: Sunil Naidu Subject: Re: Realtime-preemption for 2.6.20-rc5 ? Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:39:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701210039.27284.pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1774 Lines: 41 Hello Sunil and Ingo, Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago) > 2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu wrote: > I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say > 2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt > patch? > > If yes, any reason why we need to apply rt patch only to a base kernel? according to my observation 2.6.19-rt15 is based/includes 2.6.19.1 changes. But there has been that nasty clear_page_dirty_for_io() bug causing corruption of ext3. Even that I have tested more 2.6.20-rc + rt, I preffer to stay on "stable" kernel on boxes which I use daily until next stable appears. I have backported clear_page_dirty_for_io() to 2.6.19-rt15 and it worked fine. I have tried to update 2.6.19-rt15 to 2.6.19.2 base. There is result of my attempt Unofficial incremental patch from 2.6.19-rt15 to 2.6.19.2 + rt http://rtime.felk.cvut.cz/repos/ppisa-linux-devel/kernel-patches/current/patch-2.6.19.2-incr.patch Kernel seems to work correctly. I have checked the patch contents and I have not noticed any RT problematic changes in the code according to my dumb knowledge. I would be very happy, if Ingo would be so kind and could confirm my findings, because I am not sure, if final 2.6.20+rt would be ready before we need to prepare setup for our next semester classes at university. Best wishes Pavel Pisa e-mail: pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz www: http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa work: http://www.pikron.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/