Subject: Re: [PATCH] mnt: remove unneeded conversion to bool
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, davidcomponentone@gmail.com,
        shuah@kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Yang Guang <yang.guang5@zte.com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <3a7435c9e7e7aa8f24d22fd576ce912eb0540272.1637737086.git.yang.guang5@zte.com.cn>
 <07f4ba23-cf4c-6817-f7a4-5428f35d966c@linuxfoundation.org>
 <983ee57718a6e5838f79be96b7f7efc638177f76.camel@perches.com>
 <eef8e264-7cf7-8747-867e-b40c9f180d0d@linuxfoundation.org>
 <2236458d6a4e77bd09afb13bba65747a3416f293.camel@perches.com>
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <aaef3a0e-4ed6-36b9-030c-13ad8455fc76@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:00:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2236458d6a4e77bd09afb13bba65747a3416f293.camel@perches.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/3/21 8:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 17:24 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 12/3/21 12:50 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 11:26 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 11/24/21 5:56 PM, davidcomponentone@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@zte.com.cn>
>>>>>
>>>>> The coccinelle report
>>>>> ./tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c:285:54-59:
>>>>> WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
>>>>> ./tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c:207:54-59:
>>>>> WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
>>>>> Relational and logical operators evaluate to bool,
>>>>> explicit conversion is overly verbose and unneeded.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@zte.com.cn>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
>>>>> index 584dc6bc3b06..d2917054fe3a 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
>>>>> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bool test_unpriv_remount(const char *fstype, const char *mount_options,
>>>>>     		if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
>>>>>     			die("child did not terminate cleanly\n");
>>>>>     		}
>>>>> -		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS ? true : false;
>>>>> +		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     
>>>>>     	create_and_enter_userns();
>>>>> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static bool test_priv_mount_unpriv_remount(void)
>>>>>     		if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
>>>>>     			die("child did not terminate cleanly\n");
>>>>>     		}
>>>>> -		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS ? true : false;
>>>>> +		return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     
>>>>>     	orig_mnt_flags = read_mnt_flags(orig_path);
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This change doesn't look right. WEXITSTATUS(status) return could be
>>>>> 1 or 0 or negative.
>>>
>>> The change is at least logically correct.
>>>
>>> And isn't WEXITSTATUS range limited from 0->255 ?
>>>
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Exit-Status.html
>>>
>>
>> You are right. In any case, I don't see any value in changing the current
>> logic. The way it is coded is cryptic enough :)
> 
> Well, it'd be more like the rest of the kernel when changed.
> 
> bool function()
> {
> 	...
> 	return <foo> ? true : false;
> }
> 
> is pretty redundant.
> 
> 

Fair enough.

Yang Guang,

Applied patch. In the future, make sure to use selftests/<test>: convention
for patch summary. I fixed this one for now.

thanks,
-- Shuah