Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BD7C433FE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348254AbhLFTKc (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:10:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348248AbhLFTKa (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:10:30 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE871C061746 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 11:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id z18so14171561iof.5 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:07:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PgabJr+9sQV3frT98YiWueANGFug5mWF8hI/4tdX/WU=; b=fgZTcqiYTmB4gaLnuBVCnHo3L+VXWP9HTGhaU4u/h6rvZ6iRHC/8CGQSXrVhFQbLSD DEu9fGCRts9tFoVknIvvnfYAPgF3mF0L9mufeRlnMiwMcuyydsb2zUvmmvKn2Be5tUCA 4tWtAXd15Hv/72rOb5L/xSTCtVo8++aPVCYOzjY7OG5T25OJpsd19b88fMYnFogvoDBB GgpJATPGOjKchXyvpGkZdq3T1FlTv+k+jU2aoPwHaYUT3egFrsUS07Tuo67oU2oFRnv0 SFvwYL/a5aByVlkHihnMPbq7Z831x+tevE5+zi9xHRQPkHK3m/BLhAzbNOYfoVa4zKis lENw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PgabJr+9sQV3frT98YiWueANGFug5mWF8hI/4tdX/WU=; b=fp3J4DMMk3Is2fRaoaCspMxJteeidfQORoFVAzTkP/sB/skiwR8N7rWWLrLEiupmSD CJPFUtBk888TrWobfuY7z1yuaCYrAqWHuUDDMUMmJYARzbZG+mk2J+sLyw7MLJ7j45X+ e+qYgwNiNUB14oD4MKk6hF5GLyRszmoQIwESwP6KL9/GzEaaulUVCUX/VllLZ3+P5EYA Ptwc4TnOwq7MrSW+VHTT8LmrsVv7H3XO6xxk1en1gf4NeQeDaCRe9YUFBwRisaSmSbRY PE680fJ6GFgLIISfzA/tJxhWPTNfkivuMeKKJNyewsQTfw66pYx5VywFqHUydwIWtmhU QoNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530L1xqLos8WMMM0esneEsUEQ1U+F91gImy4JL6Rr9kuAxaRF/zw SEvOKDPkrueTbKTD3+EWaKzioQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaW1h9zQyIDIf0F1W8mfLJ3gtZw+ioJ5q7+4tZJGbuRXBMaRAHT1JC1hD3s1ZK2iylr5tgPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7a0c:: with SMTP id h12mr1716474iom.176.1638817621226; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([207.135.234.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm4875132ilc.8.2021.12.06.11.07.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:07:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags To: John Garry Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, hare@suse.de References: <1638794990-137490-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <67feacc8-3da7-90de-cc0c-f8b529f84297@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:07:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1638794990-137490-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/6/21 5:49 AM, John Garry wrote: > In [0] Kashyap reports high CPU usage for blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() > and callees for shared tags. > > Indeed blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() would be less optimum for moving to > shared tags, but it was not optimum previously. > > This series optimises by having only a single iter (per regular and resv > tags) for the shared tags, instead of an iter per HW queue. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/e4e92abbe9d52bcba6b8cc6c91c442cc@mail.gmail.com/ The patch(es) are missing Fixes tags. -- Jens Axboe